INRO vs. SECT

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

INRO (Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF) and SECT (Main Sector Rotation ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, INRO returned 31.94% vs 31.18% for SECT. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. INRO charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for SECT.

Performance

INRO vs. SECT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF (INRO) and Main Sector Rotation ETF (SECT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INRO achieves a 13.70% return, which is significantly higher than SECT's 12.42% return.

INRO

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: 2.10%
• YTD: 13.70%
• 6M: 13.07%
• 1Y: 31.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SECT

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 3.69%
• YTD: 12.42%
• 6M: 11.71%
• 1Y: 31.18%
• 3Y*: 20.42%
• 5Y*: 13.00%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INRO vs. SECT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
INRO Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF	13.70%	16.67%	10.92%
SECT Main Sector Rotation ETF	12.42%	17.80%	9.61%

Correlation

The correlation between INRO and SECT is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2024	0.94

The correlation between INRO and SECT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

INRO vs. SECT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	INRO	SECT
Technology	41.7%	45.7%
Consumer Cyclical	11.1%	10.5%
Financial Services	9.6%	17.3%
Industrials	8.7%	11.3%
Communication Services	8.0%	1.4%
Healthcare	8.0%	0.2%
Consumer Defensive	6.5%	0.4%
Energy	2.6%	3.8%
Basic Materials	1.9%	3.5%
Utilities	1.3%	6.0%
Real Estate	0.4%	0.0%

Return for Risk

INRO vs. SECT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INRO

INRO Risk / Return Rank: 75
INRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
INRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
INRO Omega Ratio Rank: 75
INRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
INRO Martin Ratio Rank: 81

SECT

SECT Risk / Return Rank: 68
SECT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
SECT Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
SECT Omega Ratio Rank: 71
SECT Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
SECT Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INRO vs. SECT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF (INRO) and Main Sector Rotation ETF (SECT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	INRO	SECT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.34	2.26	+0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.17	3.02	+0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.41	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.43	2.92	+0.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.50	11.85	+3.66

INRO vs. SECT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INRO Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the SECT Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INRO and SECT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

INRO vs. SECT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INRO drawdown since its inception was -20.02%, smaller than the maximum SECT drawdown of -38.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INRO and SECT.

Drawdown Indicators

	INRO	SECT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.02%	-38.09%	+18.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.36%	-10.71%	+1.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.71%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.71%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.49%	-0.03%	-0.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.58%	-4.64%	+2.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.07%	2.64%	-0.57%

Volatility

INRO vs. SECT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF (INRO) is 5.60%, while Main Sector Rotation ETF (SECT) has a volatility of 5.90%. This indicates that INRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SECT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INRO	SECT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.60%	5.90%	-0.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.08%	10.89%	+0.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.72%	13.87%	-0.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.26%	17.94%	-0.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.26%	20.16%	-2.90%

INRO vs. SECT - Expense Ratio Comparison

INRO has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than SECT's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

INRO vs. SECT - Dividend Comparison

INRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, which matches SECT's 0.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
INRO Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF	0.60%	0.68%	0.50%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SECT Main Sector Rotation ETF	0.60%	0.32%	0.45%	0.84%	0.86%	0.60%	1.37%	0.77%	1.67%	0.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INRO and SECT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, INRO and SECT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, INRO or SECT?

SECT has higher volatility (5.90%) compared to INRO (5.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INRO dropped -20.02% vs SECT's -38.09%.

Which ETF is better, INRO or SECT?

On 1-year performance, INRO leads with 31.94% vs 31.18% for SECT. On fees, INRO is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, INRO has been the lower-risk option at 5.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, INRO or SECT?

Over the 1-year period, INRO has performed better with a 31.94% return vs 31.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, INRO or SECT?

INRO is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for SECT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INRO or SECT?

INRO and SECT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.60%.

What is the main difference between INRO and SECT?

They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and Main Management. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for INRO and 0.78% for SECT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.