INRO vs. MTUM
INRO (Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INRO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by BlackRock, while MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. INRO is actively managed, while MTUM is passively managed. Over the past year, INRO returned 31.46% vs 41.76% for MTUM. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. INRO charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTUM.
Performance
INRO vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INRO achieves a 13.22% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 31.75% return.
INRO
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 6.39%
- YTD
- 13.22%
- 6M
- 13.14%
- 1Y
- 31.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MTUM
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 15.90%
- YTD
- 31.75%
- 6M
- 32.38%
- 1Y
- 41.76%
- 3Y*
- 34.75%
- 5Y*
- 15.21%
- 10Y*
- 17.31%
INRO vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
INRO Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF | 13.22% | 16.67% | 10.88% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 31.75% | 22.15% | 11.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between INRO and MTUM is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2024 | 0.89 |
The correlation between INRO and MTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
INRO vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INRO
MTUM
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
INRO
MTUM
Consumer Cyclical
INRO
MTUM
Communication Services
INRO
MTUM
Financial Services
INRO
MTUM
Industrials
INRO
MTUM
Healthcare
INRO
MTUM
Consumer Defensive
INRO
MTUM
Energy
INRO
MTUM
Basic Materials
INRO
MTUM
Real Estate
INRO
MTUM
Utilities
INRO
MTUM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INRO vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank
INRO
MTUM
INRO vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF (INRO) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INRO | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.39 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.38 | 3.64 | -0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.71 | 14.50 | +1.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INRO | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47 | 2.20 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.13 | 0.85 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
INRO vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INRO drawdown since its inception was -20.02%, smaller than the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INRO and MTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INRO | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.02% | -34.08% | +14.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -11.54% | +2.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.65% | 0.00% | -0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.61% | -6.21% | +3.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 2.89% | -0.88% |
Volatility
INRO vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF (INRO) is 3.69%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 7.68%. This indicates that INRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INRO | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.69% | 7.68% | -3.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.95% | 16.46% | -6.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.83% | 19.04% | -6.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.10% | 20.60% | -3.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.10% | 21.03% | -3.93% |
INRO vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
INRO has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
INRO vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison
INRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, more than MTUM's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INRO Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF | 0.65% | 0.68% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.60% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INRO and MTUM have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTUM has higher volatility (7.68%) compared to INRO (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INRO dropped -20.02% vs MTUM's -34.08%.
On 1-year performance, MTUM leads with 41.76% vs 31.46% for INRO. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, INRO has been the lower-risk option at 3.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 41.76% return vs 31.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for INRO.
INRO has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.60% for MTUM.
INRO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for INRO and 0.15% for MTUM.
INRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INRO and MTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer