INRO vs. LCTU

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF (INRO) and BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU).

INRO and LCTU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. INRO is an actively managed fund by BlackRock. It was launched on Mar 26, 2024. LCTU is an actively managed fund by BlackRock. It was launched on Apr 6, 2021.

Performance

INRO vs. LCTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF (INRO) and BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

INRO vs. LCTU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
INRO Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF	-4.40%	16.67%	10.88%
LCTU BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF	-5.13%	16.96%	12.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INRO achieves a -4.40% return, which is significantly higher than LCTU's -5.13% return.

INRO

• 1D: 3.22%
• 1M: -4.68%
• YTD: -4.40%
• 6M: -2.68%
• 1Y: 18.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LCTU

• 1D: 2.89%
• 1M: -5.09%
• YTD: -5.13%
• 6M: -2.83%
• 1Y: 16.96%
• 3Y*: 17.22%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INRO vs. LCTU - Expense Ratio Comparison

INRO has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than LCTU's 0.15% expense ratio.

INRO

Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF

LCTU

BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF

Return for Risk

INRO vs. LCTU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INRO

INRO Risk / Return Rank: 60
INRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
INRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
INRO Omega Ratio Rank: 61
INRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
INRO Martin Ratio Rank: 69

LCTU

LCTU Risk / Return Rank: 57
LCTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
LCTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
LCTU Omega Ratio Rank: 58
LCTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
LCTU Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INRO vs. LCTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF (INRO) and BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	INRO	LCTU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.98	0.91	+0.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.49	1.41	+0.08
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.21	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.53	1.40	+0.13
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.19	6.48	+0.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

INRO vs. LCTU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INRO Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is comparable to the LCTU Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INRO and LCTU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	INRO	LCTU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98	0.91	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.60	+0.05

Correlation

The correlation between INRO and LCTU is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

INRO vs. LCTU - Dividend Comparison

INRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than LCTU's 1.07% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
INRO Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF	0.77%	0.68%	0.50%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LCTU BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF	1.07%	1.02%	1.27%	1.46%	1.63%	2.20%

Drawdowns

INRO vs. LCTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INRO drawdown since its inception was -20.02%, smaller than the maximum LCTU drawdown of -25.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INRO and LCTU.

Drawdown Indicators

	INRO	LCTU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.02%	-25.93%	+5.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.37%	-12.49%	+0.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.45%	-6.76%	+0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.75%	-6.51%	+3.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.63%	2.69%	-0.06%

Volatility

INRO vs. LCTU - Volatility Comparison

Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF (INRO) has a higher volatility of 5.79% compared to BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) at 5.40%. This indicates that INRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCTU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INRO	LCTU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.79%	5.40%	+0.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.16%	9.84%	+0.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.69%	18.76%	-0.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.37%	17.17%	+0.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.37%	17.17%	+0.20%