PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INRO vs. BLCV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

INRO vs. BLCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF (INRO) and Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

INRO vs. BLCV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
INRO
Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF
-4.40%16.67%10.88%
BLCV
Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF
-2.92%19.96%1.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INRO achieves a -4.40% return, which is significantly lower than BLCV's -2.92% return.


INRO

1D
3.22%
1M
-4.68%
YTD
-4.40%
6M
-2.68%
1Y
18.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BLCV

1D
2.34%
1M
-5.90%
YTD
-2.92%
6M
1.43%
1Y
12.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


INRO vs. BLCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

INRO has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than BLCV's 0.55% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

INRO vs. BLCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INRO
INRO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
INRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
INRO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
INRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
INRO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

BLCV
BLCV Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
BLCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLCV Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
BLCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLCV Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INRO vs. BLCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF (INRO) and Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INROBLCVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.98

0.83

+0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.49

1.23

+0.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.17

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

1.22

+0.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.19

4.76

+2.44

INRO vs. BLCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INRO Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is comparable to the BLCV Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INRO and BLCV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INROBLCVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

0.83

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

1.24

-0.59

Correlation

The correlation between INRO and BLCV is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

INRO vs. BLCV - Dividend Comparison

INRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than BLCV's 1.40% yield.


TTM202520242023
INRO
Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF
0.77%0.68%0.50%0.00%
BLCV
Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF
1.40%1.37%1.63%1.02%

Drawdowns

INRO vs. BLCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INRO drawdown since its inception was -20.02%, which is greater than BLCV's maximum drawdown of -13.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INRO and BLCV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


INROBLCVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.02%

-13.44%

-6.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.37%

-11.18%

-1.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.45%

-7.81%

+1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.75%

-2.06%

-0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

2.87%

-0.24%

Volatility

INRO vs. BLCV - Volatility Comparison

Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF (INRO) has a higher volatility of 5.79% compared to Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV) at 4.74%. This indicates that INRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


INROBLCVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.79%

4.74%

+1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.16%

8.73%

+1.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.69%

15.51%

+3.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.37%

12.81%

+4.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.37%

12.81%

+4.56%