INQQ vs. ASEA

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

INQQ (INQQ The India Internet ETF) and ASEA (Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INQQ is a India Equities fund tracking the INQQ The India Internet & Ecommerce Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while ASEA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE/ASEAN 40 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, INQQ returned 2.99%/yr vs 15.21%/yr for ASEA. Their 0.38 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. INQQ charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ASEA.

Performance

INQQ vs. ASEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in INQQ The India Internet ETF (INQQ) and Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INQQ achieves a -9.24% return, which is significantly lower than ASEA's 17.61% return.

INQQ

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: 1.78%
• 6M: -1.28%
• YTD: -9.24%
• 1Y: -13.28%
• 3Y*: 2.99%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -3.37%

ASEA

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 6.95%
• 6M: 10.72%
• YTD: 17.61%
• 1Y: 32.88%
• 3Y*: 15.21%
• 5Y*: 13.10%
• 10Y*: 7.72%
• ALL TIME*: 5.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ASEA Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF	$394.47K	$542.80K	$604.39K
INQQ INQQ The India Internet ETF	$156.31K	$248.20K	$372.41K

INQQ vs. ASEA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
INQQ INQQ The India Internet ETF	-9.24%	-7.05%	19.12%	31.45%	-34.72%
ASEA Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF	17.61%	19.80%	9.82%	4.88%	-2.97%

Correlation

The correlation between INQQ and ASEA is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2022	0.38

INQQ vs. ASEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	INQQ	ASEA
Consumer Cyclical	35.9%	0.7%
Financial Services	30.2%	60.3%
Technology	10.5%	-
Communication Services	9.6%	8.0%
Energy	7.5%	3.2%
Healthcare	4.7%	2.2%
Consumer Defensive	1.6%	2.1%
Basic Materials	-	1.5%
Industrials	-	15.6%
Real Estate	-	2.8%
Utilities	-	4.3%

Return for Risk

INQQ vs. ASEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

INQQ

INQQ Risk / Return Rank: 4
INQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
INQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
INQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3
INQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
INQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6

ASEA

ASEA Risk / Return Rank: 90
ASEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
ASEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
ASEA Omega Ratio Rank: 91
ASEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
ASEA Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

INQQ vs. ASEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for INQQ The India Internet ETF (INQQ) and Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	INQQ	ASEA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.73	2.43	-3.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.98	3.43	-4.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.43	-0.54
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.44	4.22	-4.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.82	11.27	-12.09

INQQ vs. ASEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INQQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.73, which is lower than the ASEA Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INQQ and ASEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

INQQ vs. ASEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INQQ drawdown since its inception was -40.53%, smaller than the maximum ASEA drawdown of -44.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INQQ and ASEA.

Drawdown Indicators

	INQQ	ASEA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.53%	-44.16%	+3.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.07%	-8.28%	-21.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.45%	-22.20%	-10.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.20%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-44.16%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.13%	-0.56%	-19.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.28%	-10.56%	-6.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.21%	3.10%	+13.11%

Volatility

INQQ vs. ASEA - Volatility Comparison

INQQ The India Internet ETF (INQQ) has a higher volatility of 5.80% compared to Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) at 3.39%. This indicates that INQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INQQ	ASEA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.80%	3.39%	+2.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.41%	11.34%	+4.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.23%	14.53%	+3.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.94%	14.71%	+5.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.94%	17.49%	+2.45%

INQQ vs. ASEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

INQQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than ASEA's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

INQQ vs. ASEA - Dividend Comparison

INQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, less than ASEA's 3.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASEA Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF	3.67%	3.95%	3.61%	3.76%	2.23%	4.19%	2.27%	2.51%	3.08%	1.59%	2.78%	3.64%
INQQ INQQ The India Internet ETF	2.46%	2.23%	1.18%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INQQ and ASEA in my portfolio?

INQQ and ASEA have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INQQ or ASEA?

INQQ has higher volatility (5.80%) compared to ASEA (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INQQ dropped -40.53% vs ASEA's -44.16%.

Which ETF is better, INQQ or ASEA?

On 3-year performance, ASEA leads with 15.21% vs 2.99% for INQQ. On fees, ASEA is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, ASEA has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, INQQ or ASEA?

Over the 3-year period, ASEA has performed better with a 15.21% return vs 2.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, INQQ or ASEA?

ASEA is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for INQQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INQQ or ASEA?

ASEA has the higher dividend yield at 3.67%, compared with 2.46% for INQQ.

What is the main difference between INQQ and ASEA?

INQQ is categorized as India Equities, while ASEA is Asia Pacific Equities. INQQ tracks INQQ The India Internet & Ecommerce Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while ASEA tracks FTSE/ASEAN 40 Index. They also come from different issuers: EMQQ Global and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for INQQ and 0.65% for ASEA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.