INKM vs. XLE

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

INKM (SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF) and XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INKM is a Global Equities fund actively managed by State Street, while XLE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index. INKM is actively managed, while XLE is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, INKM returned 5.59%/yr vs 10.22%/yr for XLE. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INKM charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLE.

Performance

INKM vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INKM achieves a 5.61% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 32.17% return. Over the past 10 years, INKM has underperformed XLE with an annualized return of 5.59%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.22% annualized return.

INKM

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 0.93%
• YTD: 5.61%
• 6M: 5.74%
• 1Y: 13.00%
• 3Y*: 10.04%
• 5Y*: 3.96%
• 10Y*: 5.59%

XLE

• 1D: 1.29%
• 1M: -1.14%
• YTD: 32.17%
• 6M: 29.80%
• 1Y: 45.00%
• 3Y*: 17.46%
• 5Y*: 20.44%
• 10Y*: 10.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INKM vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
INKM SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF	5.61%	11.86%	5.70%	10.26%	-12.58%	8.52%	3.11%	17.12%	-5.32%	13.95%
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF	32.17%	7.88%	5.56%	-0.63%	64.32%	53.28%	-32.67%	11.74%	-18.22%	-0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between INKM and XLE is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2012	0.49

Over the past year, the correlation between INKM and XLE has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

INKM vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	INKM	XLE
Industrials	14.6%	-
Utilities	13.9%	-
Technology	13.2%	-
Energy	11.1%	100.0%
Real Estate	10.9%	-
Consumer Defensive	8.6%	-
Financial Services	8.3%	-
Healthcare	6.8%	-
Communication Services	6.2%	-
Consumer Cyclical	5.1%	-
Basic Materials	1.4%	-

Return for Risk

INKM vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INKM

INKM Risk / Return Rank: 65
INKM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
INKM Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
INKM Omega Ratio Rank: 69
INKM Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
INKM Martin Ratio Rank: 63

XLE

XLE Risk / Return Rank: 63
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 56
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INKM vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	INKM	XLE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	2.21	-0.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.12	2.84	+0.28
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.35	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.87	3.75	-0.88
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.30	10.92	+0.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

INKM vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INKM Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INKM and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	INKM	XLE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.20	2.21	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	0.79	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	0.35	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.31	+0.26

Drawdowns

INKM vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INKM drawdown since its inception was -28.58%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INKM and XLE.

Drawdown Indicators

	INKM	XLE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.58%	-71.26%	+42.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.55%	-12.05%	+7.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.25%	-20.14%	+10.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.18%	-26.04%	+6.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.58%	-66.81%	+38.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.33%	-6.15%	+5.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.69%	-17.98%	+14.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.15%	4.14%	-2.99%

Volatility

INKM vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM) is 1.67%, while State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a volatility of 8.25%. This indicates that INKM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INKM	XLE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.67%	8.25%	-6.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.59%	16.58%	-11.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.95%	20.53%	-14.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.30%	26.02%	-17.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.78%	29.59%	-19.81%

INKM vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

INKM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

INKM vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

INKM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, more than XLE's 2.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
INKM SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF	4.86%	5.82%	4.83%	4.56%	5.03%	3.74%	3.88%	4.38%	4.08%	3.10%	3.39%	3.45%
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF	2.54%	3.28%	3.36%	3.55%	3.68%	4.21%	5.62%	6.72%	3.54%	3.03%	2.26%	3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INKM and XLE in my portfolio?

INKM and XLE have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INKM or XLE?

XLE has higher volatility (8.25%) compared to INKM (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INKM dropped -28.58% vs XLE's -71.26%.

Which ETF is better, INKM or XLE?

On 10-year performance, XLE leads with 10.22% vs 5.59% for INKM. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, INKM has been the lower-risk option at 1.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, INKM or XLE?

Over the 10-year period, XLE has performed better with a 10.22% return vs 5.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, INKM or XLE?

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for INKM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INKM or XLE?

INKM has the higher dividend yield at 4.86%, compared with 2.54% for XLE.

What is the main difference between INKM and XLE?

INKM is categorized as Global Equities, while XLE is Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for INKM and 0.08% for XLE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.