INKM vs. NZAC
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM) and SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC).
INKM and NZAC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. INKM is an actively managed fund by State Street. It was launched on Apr 25, 2012. NZAC is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned Index. It was launched on Nov 25, 2014.
Performance
INKM vs. NZAC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
INKM vs. NZAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INKM SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF | 2.48% | 11.86% | 5.70% | 10.26% | -12.58% | 8.52% | 3.11% | 17.12% | -5.32% | 13.95% |
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF | -4.15% | 20.55% | 16.67% | 23.22% | -19.77% | 18.35% | 17.21% | 28.24% | -9.80% | 22.93% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INKM achieves a 2.48% return, which is significantly higher than NZAC's -4.15% return. Over the past 10 years, INKM has underperformed NZAC with an annualized return of 5.48%, while NZAC has yielded a comparatively higher 10.95% annualized return.
INKM
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -3.01%
- YTD
- 2.48%
- 6M
- 3.39%
- 1Y
- 10.75%
- 3Y*
- 8.82%
- 5Y*
- 4.13%
- 10Y*
- 5.48%
NZAC
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- -4.15%
- 6M
- -2.11%
- 1Y
- 18.02%
- 3Y*
- 15.48%
- 5Y*
- 8.30%
- 10Y*
- 10.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
INKM vs. NZAC - Expense Ratio Comparison
INKM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than NZAC's 0.12% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
INKM vs. NZAC — Risk / Return Rank
INKM
NZAC
INKM vs. NZAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM) and SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INKM | NZAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.38 | 1.01 | +0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.95 | 1.57 | +0.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.23 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 1.71 | +0.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.53 | 7.14 | +1.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INKM | NZAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 1.01 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.64 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between INKM and NZAC is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
INKM vs. NZAC - Dividend Comparison
INKM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.01%, more than NZAC's 1.98% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INKM SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF | 5.01% | 5.82% | 4.83% | 4.56% | 5.03% | 3.74% | 3.88% | 4.38% | 4.08% | 3.10% | 3.39% | 3.45% |
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF | 1.98% | 1.90% | 1.88% | 1.65% | 1.81% | 1.62% | 1.59% | 2.17% | 2.53% | 2.20% | 2.00% | 2.40% |
Drawdowns
INKM vs. NZAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INKM drawdown since its inception was -28.58%, smaller than the maximum NZAC drawdown of -33.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INKM and NZAC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| INKM | NZAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.58% | -33.72% | +5.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.76% | -10.85% | +5.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.18% | -28.31% | +9.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.58% | -33.72% | +5.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.21% | -6.21% | +3.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.73% | -5.39% | +1.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.30% | 2.60% | -1.30% |
Volatility
INKM vs. NZAC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM) is 2.97%, while SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) has a volatility of 6.20%. This indicates that INKM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NZAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| INKM | NZAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | 6.20% | -3.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.62% | 10.12% | -5.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.83% | 17.94% | -10.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.30% | 16.73% | -8.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.77% | 17.09% | -7.32% |