INGR vs. SMH
INGR (Ingredion Incorporated) is a stock, while SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Over the past 10 years, INGR returned 0.03%/yr vs 35.15%/yr for SMH. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
INGR vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INGR achieves a -5.07% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 57.98% return. Over the past 10 years, INGR has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 0.03%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 35.15% annualized return.
INGR
- 1D
- 3.10%
- 1M
- 2.30%
- 6M
- -11.01%
- YTD
- -5.07%
- 1Y
- -22.15%
- 3Y*
- 0.54%
- 5Y*
- 6.15%
- 10Y*
- 0.03%
SMH
- 1D
- -3.70%
- 1M
- -7.64%
- 6M
- 43.52%
- YTD
- 57.98%
- 1Y
- 97.28%
- 3Y*
- 53.38%
- 5Y*
- 36.57%
- 10Y*
- 35.15%
INGR vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INGR Ingredion Incorporated | -5.07% | -17.86% | 29.22% | 14.08% | 4.47% | 26.35% | -12.55% | 4.70% | -33.10% | 13.87% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 57.98% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between INGR and SMH is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2000 | 0.31 |
The correlation between INGR and SMH shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INGR vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
INGR
SMH
INGR vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INGR | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.41 | -0.61 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | 6.54 | -7.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.41 | 20.41 | -21.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INGR vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INGR drawdown since its inception was -64.20%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INGR and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INGR | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.20% | -84.96% | +20.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.07% | -14.95% | -13.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.40% | -35.74% | -0.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.40% | -45.30% | +8.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.14% | -45.30% | -10.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.74% | -14.95% | -15.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.37% | -40.93% | +22.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.14% | 4.78% | +11.36% |
Volatility
INGR vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) is 6.36%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 17.01%. This indicates that INGR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INGR | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.36% | 17.01% | -10.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.62% | 31.61% | -18.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.23% | 36.97% | -19.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.34% | 36.21% | -14.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.86% | 33.16% | -8.30% |
Dividends
INGR vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
INGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, more than SMH's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INGR Ingredion Incorporated | 3.21% | 2.92% | 1.72% | 2.75% | 2.78% | 2.67% | 3.23% | 2.70% | 2.68% | 1.57% | 1.52% | 1.82% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.19% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INGR and SMH have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (17.01%) compared to INGR (6.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INGR dropped -64.20% vs SMH's -84.96%.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs -1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INGR and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer