INGR vs. QQQM
INGR (Ingredion Incorporated) is a stock, while QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 5 years, INGR returned 3.77%/yr vs 18.07%/yr for QQQM. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
INGR vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INGR achieves a -7.13% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 21.39% return.
INGR
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -5.60%
- YTD
- -7.13%
- 6M
- -5.98%
- 1Y
- -25.09%
- 3Y*
- 0.57%
- 5Y*
- 3.77%
- 10Y*
- 0.92%
QQQM
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 10.67%
- YTD
- 21.39%
- 6M
- 19.75%
- 1Y
- 41.98%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 18.07%
- 10Y*
- —
INGR vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INGR Ingredion Incorporated | -7.13% | -17.86% | 29.22% | 14.08% | 4.47% | 26.35% | 2.38% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 21.39% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 55.01% | -32.52% | 27.45% | 6.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between INGR and QQQM is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020 | 0.20 |
The correlation between INGR and QQQM shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.23 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INGR vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
INGR
QQQM
INGR vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INGR | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.75 | 1.45 | -0.70 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.97 | 3.53 | -4.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.63 | 13.52 | -15.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INGR | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.54 | 2.65 | -4.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.82 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.85 | -0.56 |
Drawdowns
INGR vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INGR drawdown since its inception was -64.20%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INGR and QQQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INGR | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.20% | -35.04% | -29.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.04% | -11.96% | -14.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.62% | -22.70% | -9.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.62% | -35.04% | +2.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.24% | -0.20% | -32.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.31% | -8.25% | -10.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.45% | 3.11% | +12.34% |
Volatility
INGR vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) has a higher volatility of 5.11% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 4.48%. This indicates that INGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INGR | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.11% | 4.48% | +0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.72% | 12.05% | -0.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.40% | 15.91% | +0.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.28% | 22.24% | -0.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.88% | 22.12% | +2.76% |
Dividends
INGR vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
INGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, more than QQQM's 0.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INGR Ingredion Incorporated | 3.23% | 2.92% | 1.72% | 2.75% | 2.78% | 2.67% | 3.23% | 2.70% | 2.68% | 1.57% | 1.52% | 1.82% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INGR and QQQM have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INGR has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to QQQM (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INGR dropped -64.20% vs QQQM's -35.04%.
QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs -1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INGR and QQQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer