PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INGR vs. AJG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

INGR vs. AJG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) and Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INGR achieves a -4.81% return, which is significantly lower than AJG's -1.36% return. Over the past 10 years, INGR has underperformed AJG with an annualized return of 0.06%, while AJG has yielded a comparatively higher 19.74% annualized return.


INGR

1D
-0.04%
1M
5.60%
6M
-9.34%
YTD
-4.81%
1Y
-20.64%
3Y*
0.57%
5Y*
6.05%
10Y*
0.06%
ALL TIME*
9.13%

AJG

1D
-0.09%
1M
18.50%
6M
-1.25%
YTD
-1.36%
1Y
-18.08%
3Y*
6.09%
5Y*
13.67%
10Y*
19.74%
ALL TIME*
12.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INGR vs. AJG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INGR
Ingredion Incorporated
-4.81%-17.86%29.22%14.08%4.47%26.35%-12.55%4.70%-33.10%13.87%
AJG
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
-1.36%-8.03%27.34%20.51%12.44%39.02%32.12%31.79%19.19%25.04%

Correlation

The correlation between INGR and AJG is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 1997

0.29

Fundamentals

Market Cap

INGR:

$6.46B

AJG:

$65.18B

EPS

INGR:

$15.76

AJG:

$5.74

PE Ratio

INGR:

6.50

AJG:

44.21

PEG Ratio

INGR:

0.07

AJG:

4.58

PS Ratio

INGR:

0.82

AJG:

4.74

Total Revenue (TTM)

INGR:

$5.41B

AJG:

$13.94B

Gross Profit (TTM)

INGR:

$1.36B

AJG:

$7.63B

EBITDA (TTM)

INGR:

$902.00M

AJG:

$3.66B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INGR vs. AJG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INGR
INGR Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
INGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
INGR Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
INGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
INGR Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

AJG
AJG Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
AJG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AJG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
AJG Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
AJG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
AJG Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INGR vs. AJG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) and Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INGRAJGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

0.91

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.74

-0.47

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.33

-0.79

-0.54

INGR vs. AJG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INGR Sharpe Ratio is -1.21, which is lower than the AJG Sharpe Ratio of -0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INGR and AJG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INGR vs. AJG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INGR drawdown since its inception was -64.20%, which is greater than AJG's maximum drawdown of -57.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INGR and AJG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INGRAJGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.20%

-57.49%

-6.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.85%

-38.59%

+10.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.40%

-44.40%

+8.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.40%

-44.40%

+8.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.14%

-44.40%

-11.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.55%

-26.31%

-4.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.37%

-12.87%

-5.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.57%

23.05%

-7.48%

Volatility

INGR vs. AJG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) is 5.92%, while Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG) has a volatility of 10.92%. This indicates that INGR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AJG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INGRAJGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.92%

10.92%

-5.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.32%

24.11%

-11.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.22%

29.72%

-12.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.31%

23.42%

-2.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.87%

23.24%

+1.63%

Dividends

INGR vs. AJG - Dividend Comparison

INGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, more than AJG's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AJG
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
1.06%1.00%0.85%0.98%1.08%1.13%1.46%1.81%2.23%2.47%2.93%3.62%
INGR
Ingredion Incorporated
3.20%2.92%1.72%2.75%2.78%2.67%3.23%2.70%2.68%1.57%1.52%1.82%

Financials

INGR vs. AJG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ingredion Incorporated and Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
3.63B
(INGR) Total Revenue
(AJG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


INGR and AJG have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AJG has higher volatility (10.92%) compared to INGR (5.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INGR dropped -64.20% vs AJG's -57.49%.

AJG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.61 vs -1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INGR and AJG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer