ING vs. PICK

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

ING (ING Groep N.V.) is a stock, while PICK (iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF) is Metals fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers ex Gold and Silver Investable Market Index. Over the past 10 years, ING returned 17.77%/yr vs 16.39%/yr for PICK. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

ING vs. PICK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ING Groep N.V. (ING) and iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ING having a 15.16% return and PICK slightly lower at 14.51%. Over the past 10 years, ING has outperformed PICK with an annualized return of 17.77%, while PICK has yielded a comparatively lower 16.39% annualized return.

ING

• 1D: -1.90%
• 1M: 1.80%
• YTD: 15.16%
• 6M: 14.10%
• 1Y: 53.50%
• 3Y*: 44.44%
• 5Y*: 27.34%
• 10Y*: 17.77%

PICK

• 1D: -2.43%
• 1M: -7.52%
• YTD: 14.51%
• 6M: 14.07%
• 1Y: 63.17%
• 3Y*: 17.30%
• 5Y*: 9.85%
• 10Y*: 16.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ING vs. PICK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ING ING Groep N.V.	15.16%	91.12%	12.25%	31.88%	-4.22%	55.41%	-21.66%	20.03%	-41.15%	35.53%
PICK iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF	14.51%	51.89%	-16.37%	9.69%	2.54%	22.61%	27.46%	16.47%	-18.65%	38.42%

Correlation

The correlation between ING and PICK is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012	0.53

The correlation between ING and PICK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ING vs. PICK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ING

ING Risk / Return Rank: 86
ING Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
ING Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
ING Omega Ratio Rank: 85
ING Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
ING Martin Ratio Rank: 86

PICK

PICK Risk / Return Rank: 69
PICK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
PICK Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
PICK Omega Ratio Rank: 67
PICK Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
PICK Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ING vs. PICK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ING Groep N.V. (ING) and iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ING	PICK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.05	2.10	-0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.78	2.60	+0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.36	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.71	3.25	-0.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.85	12.00	-3.15

ING vs. PICK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ING Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the PICK Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ING and PICK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ING vs. PICK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ING drawdown since its inception was -92.73%, which is greater than PICK's maximum drawdown of -68.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ING and PICK.

Drawdown Indicators

	ING	PICK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.73%	-68.87%	-23.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.86%	-19.54%	-0.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.86%	-32.52%	+12.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.39%	-36.37%	-7.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-75.27%	-52.72%	-22.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.57%	-14.71%	+11.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-45.74%	-24.05%	-21.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.06%	5.28%	+0.78%

Volatility

ING vs. PICK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ING Groep N.V. (ING) is 8.25%, while iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) has a volatility of 13.30%. This indicates that ING experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PICK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ING	PICK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.25%	13.30%	-5.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.65%	26.68%	-5.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.39%	30.24%	-3.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.31%	28.15%	+3.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.40%	28.34%	+6.06%

Dividends

ING vs. PICK - Dividend Comparison

ING's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, more than PICK's 2.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ING ING Groep N.V.	4.78%	4.78%	7.65%	5.86%	7.16%	5.09%	0.00%	5.92%	2.63%	3.28%	4.24%	2.58%
PICK iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF	2.26%	2.88%	3.26%	4.19%	6.93%	5.89%	2.27%	5.51%	4.77%	2.41%	1.15%	15.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ING and PICK in my portfolio?

ING and PICK have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ING or PICK?

PICK has higher volatility (13.30%) compared to ING (8.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ING dropped -92.73% vs PICK's -68.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PICK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.