PICK vs. PFFR
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) and InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (PFFR).
PICK and PFFR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PICK is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers Ex Gold & Silver Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jan 31, 2012. PFFR is a passively managed fund by Virtus Investment Partners that tracks the performance of the Indxx REIT Preferred Stock Index. It was launched on Feb 7, 2017. Both PICK and PFFR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PICK or PFFR.
Correlation
The correlation between PICK and PFFR is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
PICK vs. PFFR - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
PICK:
-0.58
PFFR:
1.15
PICK:
-0.68
PFFR:
1.58
PICK:
0.92
PFFR:
1.20
PICK:
-0.53
PFFR:
0.82
PICK:
-1.23
PFFR:
4.61
PICK:
10.41%
PFFR:
2.03%
PICK:
22.15%
PFFR:
8.16%
PICK:
-68.87%
PFFR:
-53.02%
PICK:
-23.30%
PFFR:
-5.87%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PICK achieves a -15.65% return, which is significantly lower than PFFR's 7.47% return.
PICK
-15.65%
-8.64%
-12.00%
-14.84%
8.27%
6.09%
PFFR
7.47%
-1.16%
5.47%
10.24%
1.28%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PICK vs. PFFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PICK has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than PFFR's 0.45% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PICK vs. PFFR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) and InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (PFFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PICK vs. PFFR - Dividend Comparison
PICK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, less than PFFR's 7.07% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PICK iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 3.23% | 4.19% | 6.93% | 5.89% | 2.27% | 5.51% | 4.77% | 2.41% | 1.15% | 15.77% | 2.88% | 3.39% |
PFFR InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF | 7.07% | 7.72% | 9.65% | 6.08% | 6.11% | 5.77% | 6.48% | 5.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PICK vs. PFFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PICK drawdown since its inception was -68.87%, which is greater than PFFR's maximum drawdown of -53.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PICK and PFFR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PICK vs. PFFR - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) has a higher volatility of 6.34% compared to InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (PFFR) at 2.52%. This indicates that PICK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.