PICK vs. PFFR
PICK (iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF) and PFFR (InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PICK is a Materials fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers Ex Gold & Silver Investable Market Index, while PFFR is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the Indxx REIT Preferred Stock Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PICK returned 11.78%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for PFFR. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PICK charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for PFFR.
Performance
PICK vs. PFFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PICK achieves a 30.58% return, which is significantly higher than PFFR's 0.80% return.
PICK
- 1D
- -2.74%
- 1M
- 11.27%
- YTD
- 30.58%
- 6M
- 38.84%
- 1Y
- 88.13%
- 3Y*
- 22.92%
- 5Y*
- 11.78%
- 10Y*
- 17.67%
PFFR
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- 6.82%
- 3Y*
- 9.27%
- 5Y*
- 0.97%
- 10Y*
- —
PICK vs. PFFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PICK iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 30.58% | 51.89% | -16.37% | 9.69% | 2.54% | 22.61% | 27.46% | 16.47% | -18.65% | 22.86% |
PFFR InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF | 0.80% | 5.36% | 7.12% | 21.04% | -23.90% | 6.76% | 0.19% | 20.28% | -7.45% | 7.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between PICK and PFFR is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2017 | 0.30 |
PICK vs. PFFR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PICK
PFFR
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
PICK
PFFR
-
Industrials
PICK
PFFR
-
Technology
PICK
PFFR
-
Energy
PICK
PFFR
-
Consumer Defensive
PICK
PFFR
-
Financial Services
PICK
PFFR
Communication Services
PICK
-
PFFR
-
Consumer Cyclical
PICK
-
PFFR
-
Healthcare
PICK
-
PFFR
-
Real Estate
PICK
-
PFFR
Utilities
PICK
-
PFFR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PICK vs. PFFR — Risk / Return Rank
PICK
PFFR
PICK vs. PFFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) and InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (PFFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PICK | PFFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.16 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.53 | 1.04 | +3.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.20 | 2.44 | +15.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PICK | PFFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.16 | 0.87 | +2.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.09 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.16 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
PICK vs. PFFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PICK drawdown since its inception was -68.87%, which is greater than PFFR's maximum drawdown of -53.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PICK and PFFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PICK | PFFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.87% | -53.02% | -15.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.54% | -6.57% | -12.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.52% | -11.16% | -21.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.37% | -29.80% | -6.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.74% | -3.05% | +0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.12% | -7.00% | -17.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.86% | 2.80% | +2.06% |
Volatility
PICK vs. PFFR - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) has a higher volatility of 10.99% compared to InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (PFFR) at 2.81%. This indicates that PICK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PICK | PFFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.99% | 2.81% | +8.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.11% | 6.14% | +17.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.10% | 7.91% | +20.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.78% | 10.47% | +17.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.37% | 20.54% | +7.83% |
PICK vs. PFFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PICK has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than PFFR's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
PICK vs. PFFR - Dividend Comparison
PICK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, less than PFFR's 8.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFFR InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF | 8.29% | 7.99% | 7.78% | 7.72% | 8.60% | 6.08% | 6.11% | 5.77% | 6.48% | 6.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PICK iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 2.20% | 2.88% | 3.26% | 4.19% | 6.93% | 5.89% | 2.27% | 5.51% | 4.77% | 2.41% | 1.15% | 15.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PICK and PFFR have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PICK has higher volatility (10.99%) compared to PFFR (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PICK dropped -68.87% vs PFFR's -53.02%.
On 5-year performance, PICK leads with 11.78% vs 0.97% for PFFR. On fees, PICK is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, PFFR has been the lower-risk option at 2.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PICK has performed better with a 11.78% return vs 0.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PICK is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for PFFR.
PFFR has the higher dividend yield at 8.29%, compared with 2.20% for PICK.
PICK is categorized as Materials, while PFFR is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds. PICK tracks MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers Ex Gold & Silver Investable Market Index, while PFFR tracks Indxx REIT Preferred Stock Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Virtus Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PICK and 0.45% for PFFR.
PICK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PICK and PFFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer