INFR vs. PWRZ
INFR (ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF) and PWRZ (TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. INFR is passively managed, while PWRZ is actively managed. INFR charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PWRZ.
Performance
INFR vs. PWRZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
INFR
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PWRZ
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INFR vs. PWRZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF | 0.00% |
PWRZ TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF | -0.37% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INFR vs. PWRZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR) and TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF (PWRZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INFR vs. PWRZ - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INFR | PWRZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -1.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -1.21% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -0.42% | — |
Volatility
INFR vs. PWRZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INFR | PWRZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 12.75% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 12.75% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 12.75% | — |
INFR vs. PWRZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
INFR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than PWRZ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
INFR vs. PWRZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither INFR nor PWRZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF | 1.71% | 2.52% | 2.36% | 3.06% |
PWRZ TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, INFR is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
INFR is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PWRZ.
INFR has the higher dividend yield at 1.71%, compared with 0.00% for PWRZ.
They also come from different issuers: ClearBridge and TrueShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for INFR and 0.75% for PWRZ.
Find the right allocation for INFR and PWRZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer