INFQ vs. RMBS

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

INFQ (Infleqtion, Inc.) and RMBS (Rambus Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — INFQ in Software - Infrastructure, RMBS in Semiconductors. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

INFQ vs. RMBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Infleqtion, Inc. (INFQ) and Rambus Inc. (RMBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

INFQ

• 1D: 1.42%
• 1M: -7.96%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RMBS

• 1D: 8.51%
• 1M: -0.46%
• YTD: 53.63%
• 6M: 46.45%
• 1Y: 137.74%
• 3Y*: 32.72%
• 5Y*: 44.68%
• 10Y*: 27.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INFQ vs. RMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
INFQ Infleqtion, Inc.	-5.05%
RMBS Rambus Inc.	38.47%

Correlation

The correlation between INFQ and RMBS is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2026	0.45

Fundamentals

EPS INFQ : -$1.09 RMBS : $2.11
PS Ratio INFQ : 53.45 RMBS : 21.39
Total Revenue (TTM) INFQ : $9.26M RMBS : $721.16M
Gross Profit (TTM) INFQ : $5.09M RMBS : $555.52M
EBITDA (TTM) INFQ : -$13.12M RMBS : $298.07M

Return for Risk

INFQ vs. RMBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INFQ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RMBS

RMBS Risk / Return Rank: 84
RMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
RMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
RMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 81
RMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
RMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INFQ vs. RMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Infleqtion, Inc. (INFQ) and Rambus Inc. (RMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	INFQ	RMBS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.75	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.24	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.30	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.65	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.01	—

Drawdowns

INFQ vs. RMBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INFQ drawdown since its inception was -43.49%, smaller than the maximum RMBS drawdown of -97.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INFQ and RMBS.

Drawdown Indicators

	INFQ	RMBS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.49%	-97.16%	+53.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-36.69%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-48.83%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-48.83%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-52.95%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.91%	-17.28%	-14.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.91%	-74.85%	+50.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	14.83%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	INFQ	RMBS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	29.97%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	62.11%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	124.99%	76.68%	+48.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	124.99%	55.55%	+69.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	124.99%	46.44%	+78.55%

Dividends

INFQ vs. RMBS - Dividend Comparison

Neither INFQ nor RMBS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INFQ and RMBS in my portfolio?

INFQ and RMBS have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.