INFQ vs. QBTS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Infleqtion, Inc. (INFQ) and D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS).

Performance

INFQ vs. QBTS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Infleqtion, Inc. (INFQ) and D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

INFQ vs. QBTS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
INFQ Infleqtion, Inc.	-37.08%
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc	-21.75%

Fundamentals

EPS INFQ : -$1.09 QBTS : -$1.08
PS Ratio INFQ : 38.76 QBTS : 193.58
Total Revenue (TTM) INFQ : $9.26M QBTS : $24.59M
Gross Profit (TTM) INFQ : $5.09M QBTS : $20.31M
EBITDA (TTM) INFQ : -$13.12M QBTS : -$345.51M

Returns By Period

INFQ

• 1D: 9.98%
• 1M: -15.72%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QBTS

• 1D: 11.17%
• 1M: -23.16%
• YTD: -44.82%
• 6M: -41.60%
• 1Y: 89.87%
• 3Y*: 179.05%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

INFQ vs. QBTS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBTS

QBTS Risk / Return Rank: 71
QBTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
QBTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
QBTS Omega Ratio Rank: 71
QBTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
QBTS Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INFQ vs. QBTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Infleqtion, Inc. (INFQ) and D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	INFQ	QBTS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.77	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.96	0.07	-1.03

Correlation

The correlation between INFQ and QBTS is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

INFQ vs. QBTS - Dividend Comparison

Neither INFQ nor QBTS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

INFQ vs. QBTS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INFQ drawdown since its inception was -43.49%, smaller than the maximum QBTS drawdown of -96.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INFQ and QBTS.

Drawdown Indicators

	INFQ	QBTS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.49%	-96.67%	+53.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-71.01%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-37.08%	-67.78%	+30.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.91%	-66.49%	+38.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	33.60%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	INFQ	QBTS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	20.29%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	77.91%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	103.34%	117.60%	-14.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	103.34%	152.02%	-48.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	103.34%	152.02%	-48.68%

Financials