INFQ vs. QBTS

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

INFQ (Infleqtion, Inc.) and QBTS (D-Wave Quantum Inc) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — INFQ in Software - Infrastructure, QBTS in Computer Hardware. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

INFQ vs. QBTS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Infleqtion, Inc. (INFQ) and D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

INFQ

• 1D: -11.65%
• 1M: -13.76%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QBTS

• 1D: -8.19%
• 1M: -21.84%
• YTD: -12.12%
• 6M: -16.50%
• 1Y: 53.51%
• 3Y*: 141.58%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INFQ vs. QBTS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
INFQ Infleqtion, Inc.	-1.05%
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc	16.83%

Correlation

The correlation between INFQ and QBTS is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2026	0.68

Fundamentals

EPS INFQ : -$1.09 QBTS : -$1.08
PS Ratio INFQ : 55.71 QBTS : 626.49
Total Revenue (TTM) INFQ : $9.26M QBTS : $12.44M
Gross Profit (TTM) INFQ : $5.09M QBTS : $8.25M
EBITDA (TTM) INFQ : -$13.12M QBTS : -$399.03M

Return for Risk

INFQ vs. QBTS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INFQ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QBTS

QBTS Risk / Return Rank: 61
QBTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
QBTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
QBTS Omega Ratio Rank: 63
QBTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
QBTS Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INFQ vs. QBTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Infleqtion, Inc. (INFQ) and D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	INFQ	QBTS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.49	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.55	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.17	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.76	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	1.30	—

Drawdowns

INFQ vs. QBTS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INFQ drawdown since its inception was -43.49%, smaller than the maximum QBTS drawdown of -96.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INFQ and QBTS.

Drawdown Indicators

	INFQ	QBTS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.49%	-96.67%	+53.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-71.01%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-79.17%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.04%	-48.68%	+19.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.97%	-65.51%	+41.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	41.32%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	INFQ	QBTS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	30.68%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	77.16%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	126.40%	109.74%	+16.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	126.40%	150.77%	-24.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	126.40%	150.77%	-24.37%

Dividends

INFQ vs. QBTS - Dividend Comparison

Neither INFQ nor QBTS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INFQ and QBTS in my portfolio?

INFQ and QBTS have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.