INFQ vs. XNDU

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

INFQ (Infleqtion, Inc.) and XNDU (Xanadu Quantum Technologies Ltd) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — INFQ in Software - Infrastructure, XNDU in Computer Hardware. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

INFQ vs. XNDU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Infleqtion, Inc. (INFQ) and Xanadu Quantum Technologies Ltd (XNDU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

INFQ

• 1D: -4.94%
• 1M: -16.77%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XNDU

• 1D: -0.89%
• 1M: -5.26%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INFQ vs. XNDU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
INFQ Infleqtion, Inc.	4.88%
XNDU Xanadu Quantum Technologies Ltd	11.70%

Correlation

The correlation between INFQ and XNDU is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2026	0.47

Fundamentals

Market Cap INFQ : $1.94B XNDU : $252.89M
EPS INFQ : -$0.95 XNDU : -CA$0.87
PS Ratio INFQ : 50.33 XNDU : 182.69
Total Revenue (TTM) INFQ : $9.26M XNDU : CA$3.82M
Gross Profit (TTM) INFQ : $5.09M XNDU : CA$3.65M
EBITDA (TTM) INFQ : -$13.12M XNDU : -CA$43.14M

Return for Risk

INFQ vs. XNDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Infleqtion, Inc. (INFQ) and Xanadu Quantum Technologies Ltd (XNDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

INFQ vs. XNDU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INFQ drawdown since its inception was -43.78%, smaller than the maximum XNDU drawdown of -69.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INFQ and XNDU.

Drawdown Indicators

	INFQ	XNDU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.78%	-69.49%	+25.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-43.78%	-69.08%	+25.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.43%	-46.68%	+21.25%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	INFQ	XNDU	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	121.74%	266.35%	-144.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	121.74%	266.35%	-144.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	121.74%	266.35%	-144.61%

Dividends

INFQ vs. XNDU - Dividend Comparison

Neither INFQ nor XNDU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INFQ and XNDU in my portfolio?

INFQ and XNDU have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.