PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INEQ vs. IVAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INEQ vs. IVAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) and Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INEQ achieves a 7.04% return, which is significantly lower than IVAL's 13.48% return.


INEQ

1D
0.02%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
7.04%
6M
10.06%
1Y
25.40%
3Y*
19.86%
5Y*
11.72%
10Y*

IVAL

1D
0.17%
1M
2.48%
YTD
13.48%
6M
16.58%
1Y
32.38%
3Y*
19.92%
5Y*
8.40%
10Y*
7.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INEQ vs. IVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INEQ
Columbia International Equity Income ETF
7.04%39.85%6.02%20.88%-5.95%10.18%-0.52%15.83%-18.30%24.88%
IVAL
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF
13.48%34.92%-0.71%20.61%-10.06%-0.22%-4.94%21.26%-22.50%31.03%

Correlation

The correlation between INEQ and IVAL is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2016

0.79

The correlation between INEQ and IVAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

INEQ vs. IVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
INEQ
IVAL

Financial Services

12.4%

-

Energy

10.4%
11.6%

Basic Materials

5.8%
21.2%

Healthcare

4.2%
1.8%

Utilities

4.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
7.4%

Technology

1.9%
3.9%

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Communication Services

1.4%
2.1%

Industrials

1.0%
28.5%

Consumer Cyclical

0.2%
23.5%

Financial Services

INEQ
12.4%
IVAL

-

Energy

INEQ
10.4%
IVAL
11.6%

Basic Materials

INEQ
5.8%
IVAL
21.2%

Healthcare

INEQ
4.2%
IVAL
1.8%

Utilities

INEQ
4.0%
IVAL

-

Consumer Defensive

INEQ
2.7%
IVAL
7.4%

Technology

INEQ
1.9%
IVAL
3.9%

Real Estate

INEQ
1.8%
IVAL

-

Communication Services

INEQ
1.4%
IVAL
2.1%

Industrials

INEQ
1.0%
IVAL
28.5%

Consumer Cyclical

INEQ
0.2%
IVAL
23.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INEQ vs. IVAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INEQ
INEQ Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
INEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
INEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
INEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
INEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

IVAL
IVAL Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
IVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
IVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INEQ vs. IVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) and Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INEQIVALDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.38

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

2.89

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.79

10.21

-0.42

INEQ vs. IVAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INEQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the IVAL Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INEQ and IVAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INEQIVALDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

2.12

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.48

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.34

+0.26

Drawdowns

INEQ vs. IVAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INEQ drawdown since its inception was -41.71%, smaller than the maximum IVAL drawdown of -46.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INEQ and IVAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INEQIVALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.71%

-46.09%

+4.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.56%

-11.24%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.38%

-14.92%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.51%

-31.01%

+6.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.75%

-2.77%

-0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.06%

-12.00%

+4.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

3.18%

-0.58%

Volatility

INEQ vs. IVAL - Volatility Comparison

Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) and Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL) have volatilities of 3.73% and 3.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INEQIVALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.73%

3.68%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.60%

11.99%

-1.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.45%

15.31%

-1.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.29%

17.73%

-2.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.31%

18.83%

-2.52%

INEQ vs. IVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

INEQ has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than IVAL's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

INEQ vs. IVAL - Dividend Comparison

INEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.22%, more than IVAL's 2.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INEQ
Columbia International Equity Income ETF
9.22%9.76%3.11%3.27%3.57%3.43%2.64%3.34%7.25%4.63%2.52%0.00%
IVAL
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF
2.65%2.75%3.60%5.15%8.00%3.95%2.07%2.51%2.93%1.73%2.02%1.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


INEQ and IVAL have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INEQ has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to IVAL (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INEQ dropped -41.71% vs IVAL's -46.09%.

On 5-year performance, INEQ leads with 11.72% vs 8.40% for IVAL. On fees, IVAL is cheaper at 0.39% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, INEQ has performed better with a 11.72% return vs 8.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVAL is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for INEQ.

INEQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.22%, compared with 2.65% for IVAL.

They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for INEQ and 0.39% for IVAL.

IVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INEQ and IVAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer