INEQ vs. IDOG

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

INEQ (Columbia International Equity Income ETF) and IDOG (ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. INEQ is actively managed, while IDOG is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, INEQ returned 9.75%/yr vs 10.56%/yr for IDOG. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INEQ charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IDOG.

Performance

INEQ vs. IDOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) and ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INEQ achieves a 8.27% return, which is significantly lower than IDOG's 11.85% return. Over the past 10 years, INEQ has underperformed IDOG with an annualized return of 9.75%, while IDOG has yielded a comparatively higher 10.56% annualized return.

INEQ

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: 0.32%
• 6M: 6.84%
• YTD: 8.27%
• 1Y: 25.09%
• 3Y*: 18.78%
• 5Y*: 12.73%
• 10Y*: 9.75%

IDOG

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -2.08%
• 6M: 10.39%
• YTD: 11.85%
• 1Y: 29.77%
• 3Y*: 18.64%
• 5Y*: 13.64%
• 10Y*: 10.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INEQ vs. IDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
INEQ Columbia International Equity Income ETF	8.27%	39.85%	6.02%	20.88%	-5.95%	10.18%	-0.52%	15.83%	-18.30%	24.88%
IDOG ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF	11.85%	39.94%	1.35%	23.57%	-4.50%	11.33%	-1.78%	21.93%	-13.47%	25.61%

Correlation

The correlation between INEQ and IDOG is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2016	0.78

The correlation between INEQ and IDOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

INEQ vs. IDOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	INEQ	IDOG
Financial Services	23.2%	11.3%
Industrials	13.3%	12.2%
Energy	12.1%	10.1%
Healthcare	12.0%	8.9%
Basic Materials	11.4%	10.2%
Communication Services	7.8%	9.8%
Technology	5.6%	9.1%
Consumer Cyclical	5.4%	9.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	9.1%
Utilities	2.8%	9.6%
Real Estate	1.7%	-

Return for Risk

INEQ vs. IDOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INEQ

INEQ Risk / Return Rank: 69
INEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
INEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
INEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 72
INEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
INEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 61

IDOG

IDOG Risk / Return Rank: 85
IDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
IDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
IDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 80
IDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
IDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INEQ vs. IDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) and ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	INEQ	IDOG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	2.19	-0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.60	2.95	-0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.38	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.64	4.62	-1.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.47	13.95	-5.49

INEQ vs. IDOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INEQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the IDOG Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INEQ and IDOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

INEQ vs. IDOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INEQ drawdown since its inception was -41.71%, which is greater than IDOG's maximum drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INEQ and IDOG.

Drawdown Indicators

	INEQ	IDOG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.71%	-37.32%	-4.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.56%	-6.47%	-3.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.38%	-13.92%	-0.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.51%	-25.31%	+0.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.71%	-37.32%	-4.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.65%	-2.90%	+0.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.02%	-7.88%	+0.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.97%	2.14%	+0.83%

Volatility

INEQ vs. IDOG - Volatility Comparison

Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) has a higher volatility of 3.47% compared to ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG) at 3.29%. This indicates that INEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INEQ	IDOG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.47%	3.29%	+0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.37%	11.02%	+0.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.65%	13.67%	-0.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.31%	15.67%	-0.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.35%	17.08%	-0.73%

INEQ vs. IDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

INEQ has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than IDOG's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

INEQ vs. IDOG - Dividend Comparison

INEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.64%, more than IDOG's 4.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IDOG ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF	4.40%	4.26%	4.90%	4.86%	4.46%	3.85%	3.00%	5.41%	4.50%	3.33%	4.01%	4.19%
INEQ Columbia International Equity Income ETF	9.64%	9.76%	3.11%	3.27%	3.57%	3.43%	2.64%	3.34%	7.25%	4.63%	2.52%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INEQ and IDOG in my portfolio?

INEQ and IDOG have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INEQ or IDOG?

INEQ has higher volatility (3.47%) compared to IDOG (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INEQ dropped -41.71% vs IDOG's -37.32%.

Which ETF is better, INEQ or IDOG?

On 10-year performance, IDOG leads with 10.56% vs 9.75% for INEQ. On fees, INEQ is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, IDOG has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, INEQ or IDOG?

Over the 10-year period, IDOG has performed better with a 10.56% return vs 9.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, INEQ or IDOG?

INEQ is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IDOG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INEQ or IDOG?

INEQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.64%, compared with 4.40% for IDOG.

What is the main difference between INEQ and IDOG?

They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for INEQ and 0.50% for IDOG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.