INEQ vs. CCRP
INEQ (Columbia International Equity Income ETF) and CCRP (Columbia Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INEQ is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Columbia Threadneedle, while CCRP is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by Columbia Threadneedle. Both are actively managed. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INEQ charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for CCRP.
Performance
INEQ vs. CCRP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INEQ achieves a 4.80% return, which is significantly higher than CCRP's 1.17% return.
INEQ
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -3.29%
- YTD
- 4.80%
- 6M
- 5.07%
- 1Y
- 20.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.04%
- 5Y*
- 11.66%
- 10Y*
- 9.56%
CCRP
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 1.16%
- YTD
- 1.17%
- 6M
- 1.07%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INEQ vs. CCRP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
INEQ Columbia International Equity Income ETF | 4.80% | 2.34% |
CCRP Columbia Corporate Bond ETF | 1.17% | -0.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between INEQ and CCRP is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INEQ vs. CCRP — Risk / Return Rank
INEQ
CCRP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
INEQ vs. CCRP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) and Columbia Corporate Bond ETF (CCRP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INEQ | CCRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.50 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INEQ vs. CCRP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INEQ drawdown since its inception was -41.71%, which is greater than CCRP's maximum drawdown of -2.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INEQ and CCRP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INEQ | CCRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.71% | -2.72% | -38.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.77% | -0.39% | -5.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.04% | -0.85% | -6.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | — | — |
Volatility
INEQ vs. CCRP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INEQ | CCRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.95% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.06% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.78% | 4.76% | +9.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.32% | 4.76% | +10.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.34% | 4.76% | +11.58% |
INEQ vs. CCRP - Expense Ratio Comparison
INEQ has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than CCRP's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
INEQ vs. CCRP - Dividend Comparison
INEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.27%, more than CCRP's 2.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCRP Columbia Corporate Bond ETF | 2.02% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INEQ Columbia International Equity Income ETF | 8.27% | 9.76% | 3.11% | 3.27% | 3.57% | 3.43% | 2.64% | 3.34% | 7.25% | 4.63% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INEQ and CCRP have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CCRP is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CCRP is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for INEQ.
INEQ has the higher dividend yield at 8.27%, compared with 2.02% for CCRP.
INEQ is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while CCRP is Corporate Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for INEQ and 0.18% for CCRP.
Find the right allocation for INEQ and CCRP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer