CCRP vs. BSCQ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CCRP (Columbia Corporate Bond ETF) and BSCQ (Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. CCRP is actively managed, while BSCQ is passively managed. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CCRP charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for BSCQ.

Performance

CCRP vs. BSCQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Corporate Bond ETF (CCRP) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCRP achieves a 0.76% return, which is significantly lower than BSCQ's 1.68% return.

CCRP

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 0.76%
• YTD: 0.76%
• 6M: 1.01%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BSCQ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.25%
• YTD: 1.68%
• 6M: 1.78%
• 1Y: 4.21%
• 3Y*: 5.17%
• 5Y*: 1.51%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCRP vs. BSCQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CCRP Columbia Corporate Bond ETF	0.76%	-0.30%
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF	1.68%	0.29%

Correlation

The correlation between CCRP and BSCQ is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025	0.04

Return for Risk

CCRP vs. BSCQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCRP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BSCQ

BSCQ Risk / Return Rank: 99
BSCQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Omega Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCRP vs. BSCQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Corporate Bond ETF (CCRP) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CCRP	BSCQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	6.97	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	15.43	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	3.40	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	41.36	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	181.24	—

Drawdowns

CCRP vs. BSCQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCRP drawdown since its inception was -2.72%, smaller than the maximum BSCQ drawdown of -16.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCRP and BSCQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCRP	BSCQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.72%	-16.50%	+13.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.10%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-1.13%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-13.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.80%	-0.03%	-0.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.85%	-2.83%	+1.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.02%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CCRP	BSCQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.12%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.42%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.75%	0.61%	+4.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.75%	3.29%	+1.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.75%	4.75%	0.00%

CCRP vs. BSCQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCRP has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCQ's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CCRP vs. BSCQ - Dividend Comparison

CCRP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, less than BSCQ's 4.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF	4.11%	4.14%	4.05%	3.53%	2.54%	1.91%	2.42%	2.96%	3.32%	2.92%	0.51%
CCRP Columbia Corporate Bond ETF	2.03%	0.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CCRP and BSCQ in my portfolio?

CCRP and BSCQ have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CCRP or BSCQ?

On fees, BSCQ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CCRP or BSCQ?

BSCQ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for CCRP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CCRP or BSCQ?

BSCQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.11%, compared with 2.03% for CCRP.

What is the main difference between CCRP and BSCQ?

They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for CCRP and 0.10% for BSCQ.