INDY vs. FLKR
INDY (iShares India 50 ETF) and FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - INDY tracks the S&P CNX Nifty Index while FLKR tracks the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, INDY returned 1.15%/yr vs 19.48%/yr for FLKR. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INDY charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLKR.
Performance
INDY vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INDY achieves a -15.38% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 114.41% return.
INDY
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- -3.23%
- YTD
- -15.38%
- 6M
- -14.03%
- 1Y
- -14.69%
- 3Y*
- 1.39%
- 5Y*
- 1.15%
- 10Y*
- 6.14%
FLKR
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 29.00%
- YTD
- 114.41%
- 6M
- 130.14%
- 1Y
- 238.40%
- 3Y*
- 51.14%
- 5Y*
- 19.48%
- 10Y*
- —
INDY vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INDY iShares India 50 ETF | -15.38% | 4.97% | 3.47% | 16.88% | -7.31% | 19.43% | 10.01% | 9.99% | -4.32% | 1.44% |
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 114.41% | 91.91% | -18.84% | 19.16% | -27.50% | -7.54% | 42.64% | 8.88% | -21.30% | 2.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between INDY and FLKR is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017 | 0.49 |
The correlation between INDY and FLKR shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
INDY vs. FLKR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INDY
FLKR
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
-
-
Financial Services
INDY
FLKR
Energy
INDY
FLKR
Consumer Cyclical
INDY
FLKR
Technology
INDY
FLKR
Industrials
INDY
FLKR
Basic Materials
INDY
FLKR
Consumer Defensive
INDY
FLKR
Communication Services
INDY
FLKR
Healthcare
INDY
FLKR
Utilities
INDY
FLKR
Real Estate
INDY
-
FLKR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INDY vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank
INDY
FLKR
INDY vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares India 50 ETF (INDY) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INDY | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.73 | -0.90 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | 10.42 | -11.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.78 | 38.67 | -40.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INDY | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.04 | 5.83 | -6.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.69 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.55 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
INDY vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INDY drawdown since its inception was -44.74%, smaller than the maximum FLKR drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDY and FLKR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INDY | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.74% | -50.06% | +5.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.95% | -23.03% | +4.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.40% | -26.39% | +3.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.40% | -49.51% | +27.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.00% | -1.77% | -19.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.22% | -22.07% | +9.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.25% | 6.20% | +2.05% |
Volatility
INDY vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares India 50 ETF (INDY) is 4.79%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 20.21%. This indicates that INDY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INDY | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.79% | 20.21% | -15.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.25% | 36.52% | -24.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.18% | 41.18% | -27.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.94% | 28.19% | -13.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.58% | 27.56% | -7.98% |
INDY vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison
INDY has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than FLKR's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
INDY vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison
INDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.58%, more than FLKR's 1.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 1.80% | 3.87% | 7.08% | 2.28% | 3.13% | 2.12% | 0.99% | 2.09% | 1.86% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INDY iShares India 50 ETF | 9.58% | 8.11% | 0.24% | 0.38% | 3.75% | 7.12% | 0.08% | 0.58% | 0.55% | 0.27% | 0.48% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INDY and FLKR have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLKR has higher volatility (20.21%) compared to INDY (4.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INDY dropped -44.74% vs FLKR's -50.06%.
On 5-year performance, FLKR leads with 19.48% vs 1.15% for INDY. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, INDY has been the lower-risk option at 4.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLKR has performed better with a 19.48% return vs 1.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.94% for INDY.
INDY has the higher dividend yield at 9.58%, compared with 1.80% for FLKR.
INDY tracks S&P CNX Nifty Index, while FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for INDY and 0.09% for FLKR.
FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.83 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INDY and FLKR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer