INDQ vs. PTLC

Last updated Jul 8, 2026

INDQ (Pacer ActiveAlpha India Quality ETF) and PTLC (Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INDQ is a India Equities fund actively managed by Pacer, while PTLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer Trendpilot U.S. Large Cap Index. INDQ is actively managed, while PTLC is passively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INDQ charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PTLC.

Performance

INDQ vs. PTLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer ActiveAlpha India Quality ETF (INDQ) and Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

INDQ

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: -0.66%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PTLC

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: 1.70%
• 6M: 3.34%
• YTD: 4.90%
• 1Y: 15.57%
• 3Y*: 13.68%
• 5Y*: 10.12%
• 10Y*: 11.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INDQ vs. PTLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
INDQ Pacer ActiveAlpha India Quality ETF	3.17%
PTLC Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF	11.14%

Correlation

The correlation between INDQ and PTLC is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2026	0.66

Return for Risk

INDQ vs. PTLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INDQ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PTLC

PTLC Risk / Return Rank: 43
PTLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
PTLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
PTLC Omega Ratio Rank: 42
PTLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
PTLC Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INDQ vs. PTLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer ActiveAlpha India Quality ETF (INDQ) and Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	INDQ	PTLC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.31	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.79	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.24	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.78	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	6.74	—

Drawdowns

INDQ vs. PTLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INDQ drawdown since its inception was -6.55%, smaller than the maximum PTLC drawdown of -26.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDQ and PTLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	INDQ	PTLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.55%	-26.63%	+20.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.77%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.17%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-15.17%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-26.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.09%	-1.33%	-4.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.21%	-5.62%	+2.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.32%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	INDQ	PTLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.01%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.20%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.86%	11.93%	+7.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.86%	11.88%	+7.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.86%	13.14%	+6.72%

INDQ vs. PTLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

INDQ has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than PTLC's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

INDQ vs. PTLC - Dividend Comparison

INDQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PTLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
INDQ Pacer ActiveAlpha India Quality ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PTLC Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF	1.01%	1.06%	0.67%	1.18%	1.26%	0.73%	1.08%	1.10%	1.00%	0.97%	1.08%	0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INDQ and PTLC in my portfolio?

INDQ and PTLC have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, INDQ or PTLC?

On fees, PTLC is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, INDQ or PTLC?

PTLC is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for INDQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INDQ or PTLC?

PTLC has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.00% for INDQ.

What is the main difference between INDQ and PTLC?

INDQ is categorized as India Equities, while PTLC is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for INDQ and 0.60% for PTLC.