INDA vs. FLKR
INDA (iShares MSCI India ETF) and FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - INDA tracks the MSCI India Index while FLKR tracks the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, INDA returned 2.32%/yr vs 19.48%/yr for FLKR. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INDA charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLKR.
Performance
INDA vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INDA achieves a -12.38% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 114.41% return.
INDA
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- -2.61%
- YTD
- -12.38%
- 6M
- -11.33%
- 1Y
- -12.23%
- 3Y*
- 4.17%
- 5Y*
- 2.32%
- 10Y*
- 6.56%
FLKR
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 29.00%
- YTD
- 114.41%
- 6M
- 130.14%
- 1Y
- 238.40%
- 3Y*
- 51.14%
- 5Y*
- 19.48%
- 10Y*
- —
INDA vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INDA iShares MSCI India ETF | -12.38% | 2.68% | 8.63% | 17.16% | -8.94% | 21.36% | 14.83% | 6.49% | -6.67% | 1.54% |
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 114.41% | 91.91% | -18.84% | 19.16% | -27.50% | -7.54% | 42.64% | 8.88% | -21.30% | 2.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between INDA and FLKR is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017 | 0.50 |
The correlation between INDA and FLKR shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
INDA vs. FLKR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INDA
FLKR
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
INDA
FLKR
Consumer Cyclical
INDA
FLKR
Industrials
INDA
FLKR
Energy
INDA
FLKR
Technology
INDA
FLKR
Basic Materials
INDA
FLKR
Consumer Defensive
INDA
FLKR
Healthcare
INDA
FLKR
Communication Services
INDA
FLKR
Utilities
INDA
FLKR
Real Estate
INDA
FLKR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INDA vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank
INDA
FLKR
INDA vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INDA | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.73 | -0.86 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.66 | 10.42 | -11.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.59 | 38.67 | -40.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INDA | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.84 | 5.83 | -6.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.69 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.55 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
INDA vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INDA drawdown since its inception was -45.07%, smaller than the maximum FLKR drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDA and FLKR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INDA | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.07% | -50.06% | +4.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.69% | -23.03% | +4.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.72% | -26.39% | +3.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.72% | -49.51% | +26.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.42% | -1.77% | -17.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.57% | -22.07% | +12.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.71% | 6.20% | +1.51% |
Volatility
INDA vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA) is 5.26%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 20.21%. This indicates that INDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INDA | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 20.21% | -14.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.66% | 36.52% | -23.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.67% | 41.18% | -26.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.37% | 28.19% | -12.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.12% | 27.56% | -6.44% |
INDA vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison
INDA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than FLKR's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
INDA vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison
INDA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 1.80% | 3.87% | 7.08% | 2.28% | 3.13% | 2.12% | 0.99% | 2.09% | 1.86% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INDA iShares MSCI India ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.76% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 6.44% | 0.27% | 0.99% | 0.94% | 1.09% | 0.90% | 1.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INDA and FLKR have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLKR has higher volatility (20.21%) compared to INDA (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INDA dropped -45.07% vs FLKR's -50.06%.
On 5-year performance, FLKR leads with 19.48% vs 2.32% for INDA. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, INDA has been the lower-risk option at 5.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLKR has performed better with a 19.48% return vs 2.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for INDA.
FLKR has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 0.00% for INDA.
INDA tracks MSCI India Index, while FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for INDA and 0.09% for FLKR.
FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.83 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INDA and FLKR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer