PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INDA vs. ASHR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INDA vs. ASHR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INDA achieves a -10.58% return, which is significantly lower than ASHR's 7.49% return. Over the past 10 years, INDA has outperformed ASHR with an annualized return of 7.09%, while ASHR has yielded a comparatively lower 5.65% annualized return.


INDA

1D
1.13%
1M
0.71%
YTD
-10.58%
6M
-9.05%
1Y
-10.57%
3Y*
4.51%
5Y*
2.79%
10Y*
7.09%

ASHR

1D
0.83%
1M
-0.45%
YTD
7.49%
6M
9.62%
1Y
35.11%
3Y*
11.43%
5Y*
-1.32%
10Y*
5.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INDA vs. ASHR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INDA
iShares MSCI India ETF
-10.58%2.68%8.63%17.16%-8.94%21.36%14.83%6.49%-6.67%36.08%
ASHR
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund
7.49%27.02%11.95%-12.52%-27.52%-1.57%36.29%36.50%-28.45%33.47%

Correlation

The correlation between INDA and ASHR is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2013

0.34

The correlation between INDA and ASHR shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (3 years) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

INDA vs. ASHR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
INDA
ASHR

Financial Services

28.9%
19.1%

Consumer Cyclical

12.0%
6.4%

Industrials

10.6%
16.1%

Energy

9.1%
2.5%

Basic Materials

8.6%
9.4%

Technology

8.0%
31.1%

Healthcare

6.1%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.8%
6.7%

Communication Services

5.1%
0.8%

Utilities

4.4%
3.1%

Real Estate

1.3%
0.4%

Financial Services

INDA
28.9%
ASHR
19.1%

Consumer Cyclical

INDA
12.0%
ASHR
6.4%

Industrials

INDA
10.6%
ASHR
16.1%

Energy

INDA
9.1%
ASHR
2.5%

Basic Materials

INDA
8.6%
ASHR
9.4%

Technology

INDA
8.0%
ASHR
31.1%

Healthcare

INDA
6.1%
ASHR
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

INDA
5.8%
ASHR
6.7%

Communication Services

INDA
5.1%
ASHR
0.8%

Utilities

INDA
4.4%
ASHR
3.1%

Real Estate

INDA
1.3%
ASHR
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INDA vs. ASHR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INDA
INDA Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
INDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
INDA Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
INDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
INDA Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

ASHR
ASHR Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
ASHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASHR Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
ASHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASHR Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INDA vs. ASHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INDAASHRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.35

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.63

4.41

-5.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.46

12.89

-14.35

INDA vs. ASHR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INDA Sharpe Ratio is -0.80, which is lower than the ASHR Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INDA and ASHR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INDA vs. ASHR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INDA drawdown since its inception was -45.07%, smaller than the maximum ASHR drawdown of -51.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDA and ASHR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INDAASHRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.07%

-51.30%

+6.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.69%

-7.69%

-11.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.72%

-33.12%

+10.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.72%

-44.59%

+21.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.07%

-51.30%

+6.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.77%

-17.64%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.59%

-29.15%

+19.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.09%

2.63%

+5.46%

Volatility

INDA vs. ASHR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA) is 4.16%, while Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) has a volatility of 6.04%. This indicates that INDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INDAASHRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

6.04%

-1.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.77%

12.08%

+0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.79%

17.24%

-2.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.40%

23.92%

-8.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.11%

24.06%

-2.95%

INDA vs. ASHR - Expense Ratio Comparison

INDA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than ASHR's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

INDA vs. ASHR - Dividend Comparison

INDA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASHR
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund
2.15%2.31%1.13%2.48%1.13%0.88%0.81%0.98%1.32%0.84%0.73%30.13%
INDA
iShares MSCI India ETF
0.00%0.00%0.76%0.16%0.00%6.44%0.27%0.99%0.94%1.09%0.90%1.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


INDA and ASHR have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASHR has higher volatility (6.04%) compared to INDA (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INDA dropped -45.07% vs ASHR's -51.30%.

On 10-year performance, INDA leads with 7.09% vs 5.65% for ASHR. On fees, ASHR is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, INDA has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, INDA has performed better with a 7.09% return vs 5.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ASHR is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for INDA.

ASHR has the higher dividend yield at 2.15%, compared with 0.00% for INDA.

INDA is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while ASHR is China Equities. INDA tracks MSCI India Index, while ASHR tracks CSI 300 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for INDA and 0.65% for ASHR.

ASHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INDA and ASHR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer