INCO vs. FLAU

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

INCO (Columbia India Consumer ETF) and FLAU (Franklin FTSE Australia ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - INCO tracks the Indxx India Consumer Index while FLAU tracks the FTSE Australia RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, INCO returned 5.92%/yr vs 5.94%/yr for FLAU. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INCO charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLAU.

Performance

INCO vs. FLAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) and Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INCO achieves a -10.75% return, which is significantly lower than FLAU's 10.26% return.

INCO

• 1D: 1.72%
• 1M: -2.34%
• YTD: -10.75%
• 6M: -9.88%
• 1Y: -9.38%
• 3Y*: 7.06%
• 5Y*: 5.92%
• 10Y*: 8.34%

FLAU

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -0.14%
• YTD: 10.26%
• 6M: 11.87%
• 1Y: 15.17%
• 3Y*: 13.13%
• 5Y*: 5.94%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INCO vs. FLAU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
INCO Columbia India Consumer ETF	-10.75%	0.59%	12.70%	34.63%	-7.01%	19.28%	14.55%	-4.22%	-10.81%	6.35%
FLAU Franklin FTSE Australia ETF	10.26%	15.95%	1.81%	12.58%	-5.58%	9.90%	11.00%	23.38%	-10.17%	1.89%

Correlation

The correlation between INCO and FLAU is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.36
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017	0.41

INCO vs. FLAU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	INCO	FLAU
Consumer Cyclical	59.3%	6.6%
Consumer Defensive	37.5%	3.7%
Technology	1.9%	1.2%
Industrials	1.4%	6.4%
Basic Materials	-	26.2%
Communication Services	-	1.7%
Energy	-	5.7%
Financial Services	-	36.0%
Healthcare	-	4.9%
Real Estate	-	6.4%
Utilities	-	0.8%

Return for Risk

INCO vs. FLAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INCO

INCO Risk / Return Rank: 4
INCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
INCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
INCO Omega Ratio Rank: 4
INCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
INCO Martin Ratio Rank: 4

FLAU

FLAU Risk / Return Rank: 28
FLAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
FLAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
FLAU Omega Ratio Rank: 25
FLAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
FLAU Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INCO vs. FLAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) and Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	INCO	FLAU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.56	0.92	-1.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.71	1.36	-2.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	1.17	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.44	1.52	-1.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.13	4.69	-5.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

INCO vs. FLAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INCO Sharpe Ratio is -0.56, which is lower than the FLAU Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INCO and FLAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	INCO	FLAU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.56	0.92	-1.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35	0.30	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	0.33	+0.09

Drawdowns

INCO vs. FLAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INCO drawdown since its inception was -47.69%, roughly equal to the maximum FLAU drawdown of -45.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INCO and FLAU.

Drawdown Indicators

	INCO	FLAU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.69%	-45.73%	-1.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.37%	-10.01%	-11.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.98%	-22.03%	-7.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.98%	-24.68%	-5.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.69%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.00%	-3.30%	-20.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.58%	-6.79%	-3.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.35%	3.24%	+5.11%

Volatility

INCO vs. FLAU - Volatility Comparison

Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) has a higher volatility of 5.78% compared to Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU) at 5.35%. This indicates that INCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INCO	FLAU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.78%	5.35%	+0.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.38%	13.65%	+0.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.86%	16.63%	+0.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.90%	19.60%	-2.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.31%	23.58%	-3.27%

INCO vs. FLAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

INCO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FLAU's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

INCO vs. FLAU - Dividend Comparison

INCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FLAU Franklin FTSE Australia ETF	2.95%	3.25%	3.37%	3.62%	5.91%	5.14%	2.18%	4.37%	4.34%	0.18%	0.00%
INCO Columbia India Consumer ETF	0.00%	0.00%	2.88%	3.81%	10.57%	6.25%	0.34%	0.28%	0.12%	0.05%	0.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INCO and FLAU in my portfolio?

INCO and FLAU have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INCO or FLAU?

INCO has higher volatility (5.78%) compared to FLAU (5.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INCO dropped -47.69% vs FLAU's -45.73%.

Which ETF is better, INCO or FLAU?

On 5-year performance, FLAU leads with 5.94% vs 5.92% for INCO. On fees, FLAU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLAU has been the lower-risk option at 5.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, INCO or FLAU?

Over the 5-year period, FLAU has performed better with a 5.94% return vs 5.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, INCO or FLAU?

FLAU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for INCO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INCO or FLAU?

FLAU has the higher dividend yield at 2.95%, compared with 0.00% for INCO.

What is the main difference between INCO and FLAU?

INCO tracks Indxx India Consumer Index, while FLAU tracks FTSE Australia RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for INCO and 0.09% for FLAU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.