INCO vs. DVYA
INCO (Columbia India Consumer ETF) and DVYA (iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - INCO tracks the Indxx India Consumer Index while DVYA tracks the Dow Jones Asia/Pacific Select Dividend 30 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, INCO returned 8.95%/yr vs 7.04%/yr for DVYA. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INCO charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for DVYA.
Performance
INCO vs. DVYA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INCO achieves a -8.49% return, which is significantly lower than DVYA's 8.77% return. Over the past 10 years, INCO has outperformed DVYA with an annualized return of 8.95%, while DVYA has yielded a comparatively lower 7.04% annualized return.
INCO
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 2.61%
- YTD
- -8.49%
- 6M
- -7.75%
- 1Y
- -7.35%
- 3Y*
- 7.64%
- 5Y*
- 6.82%
- 10Y*
- 8.95%
DVYA
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- -4.85%
- YTD
- 8.77%
- 6M
- 7.20%
- 1Y
- 30.32%
- 3Y*
- 20.51%
- 5Y*
- 9.32%
- 10Y*
- 7.04%
INCO vs. DVYA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INCO Columbia India Consumer ETF | -8.49% | 0.59% | 12.70% | 34.63% | -7.01% | 19.28% | 14.55% | -4.22% | -10.81% | 53.28% |
DVYA iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF | 8.77% | 30.22% | 6.05% | 13.75% | -2.17% | 3.41% | -9.61% | 14.70% | -14.87% | 16.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between INCO and DVYA is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2012 | 0.41 |
The correlation between INCO and DVYA shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.42 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
INCO vs. DVYA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INCO
DVYA
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
INCO
DVYA
Consumer Defensive
INCO
DVYA
Industrials
INCO
DVYA
Technology
INCO
DVYA
Basic Materials
INCO
-
DVYA
Communication Services
INCO
-
DVYA
Energy
INCO
-
DVYA
Financial Services
INCO
-
DVYA
Healthcare
INCO
-
DVYA
Real Estate
INCO
-
DVYA
Utilities
INCO
-
DVYA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INCO vs. DVYA — Risk / Return Rank
INCO
DVYA
INCO vs. DVYA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) and iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INCO | DVYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.40 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.35 | 3.53 | -3.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.83 | 11.48 | -12.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INCO vs. DVYA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INCO drawdown since its inception was -47.69%, roughly equal to the maximum DVYA drawdown of -45.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INCO and DVYA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INCO | DVYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.69% | -45.61% | -2.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.37% | -8.64% | -12.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.98% | -19.15% | -10.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.98% | -25.18% | -4.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.69% | -45.61% | -2.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.07% | -7.02% | -15.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.62% | -10.04% | -0.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.91% | 2.65% | +6.26% |
Volatility
INCO vs. DVYA - Volatility Comparison
Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA) at 4.21%. This indicates that INCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DVYA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INCO | DVYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.21% | 4.21% | +1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.39% | 11.07% | +3.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.04% | 13.34% | +3.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 15.16% | +1.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.30% | 17.48% | +2.82% |
INCO vs. DVYA - Expense Ratio Comparison
INCO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DVYA's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
INCO vs. DVYA - Dividend Comparison
INCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DVYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.76%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVYA iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF | 4.76% | 4.71% | 5.97% | 6.48% | 7.29% | 5.81% | 3.66% | 5.52% | 6.24% | 4.74% | 4.79% | 5.33% |
INCO Columbia India Consumer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.88% | 3.81% | 10.57% | 6.25% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.12% | 0.05% | 0.09% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INCO and DVYA have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INCO has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to DVYA (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INCO dropped -47.69% vs DVYA's -45.61%.
On 10-year performance, INCO leads with 8.95% vs 7.04% for DVYA. On fees, DVYA is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, DVYA has been the lower-risk option at 4.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, INCO has performed better with a 8.95% return vs 7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DVYA is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for INCO.
DVYA has the higher dividend yield at 4.76%, compared with 0.00% for INCO.
INCO tracks Indxx India Consumer Index, while DVYA tracks Dow Jones Asia/Pacific Select Dividend 30 Index. They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for INCO and 0.49% for DVYA.
DVYA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INCO and DVYA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer