PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
INAA.L vs. BBSU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

INAA.L vs. BBSU.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

INAA.L (iShares MSCI North America UCITS) and BBSU.L (JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, from iShares and JPMorgan respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, INAA.L returned 14.13%/yr vs 14.50%/yr for BBSU.L. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. INAA.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for BBSU.L.

Performance

INAA.L vs. BBSU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI North America UCITS (INAA.L) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBSU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with INAA.L having a 10.28% return and BBSU.L slightly higher at 10.31%.

INAA.L

1D
0.05%
1M
5.57%
YTD
10.28%
6M
10.24%
1Y
28.60%
3Y*
18.80%
5Y*
14.13%
10Y*
15.50%

BBSU.L

1D
0.07%
1M
5.58%
YTD
10.31%
6M
10.11%
1Y
28.62%
3Y*
19.09%
5Y*
14.50%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INAA.L vs. BBSU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
INAA.L
iShares MSCI North America UCITS		10.28%9.48%26.59%19.48%-10.23%28.62%15.54%11.48%
BBSU.L
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc)		10.31%9.39%27.19%20.71%-10.46%29.25%16.07%11.91%

Correlation

The correlation between INAA.L and BBSU.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2019

0.99

The correlation between INAA.L and BBSU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

INAA.L vs. BBSU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
INAA.L
BBSU.L

Technology

36.4%
35.4%

Financial Services

12.4%
11.8%

Communication Services

10.4%
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
10.1%

Industrials

8.2%
8.4%

Healthcare

8.1%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
4.8%

Energy

4.1%
3.6%

Basic Materials

2.3%
1.7%

Utilities

2.1%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

INAA.L
36.4%
BBSU.L
35.4%

Financial Services

INAA.L
12.4%
BBSU.L
11.8%

Communication Services

INAA.L
10.4%
BBSU.L
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

INAA.L
9.6%
BBSU.L
10.1%

Industrials

INAA.L
8.2%
BBSU.L
8.4%

Healthcare

INAA.L
8.1%
BBSU.L
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

INAA.L
4.6%
BBSU.L
4.8%

Energy

INAA.L
4.1%
BBSU.L
3.6%

Basic Materials

INAA.L
2.3%
BBSU.L
1.7%

Utilities

INAA.L
2.1%
BBSU.L
2.3%

Real Estate

INAA.L
1.8%
BBSU.L
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI North America UCITS

JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc)

Often compared with INAA.L:
INAA.L vs. VNRT.ASINAA.L vs. EUE.LINAA.L vs. BIBDXINAA.L vs. MXUS.LINAA.L vs. VAPX.LINAA.L vs. VTIINAA.L vs. EFA
Often compared with BBSU.L:
BBSU.L vs. XUEK.LBBSU.L vs. PCT.LBBSU.L vs. XLCBBSU.L vs. VOOBBSU.L vs. FWDBBSU.L vs. VUAA.DEBBSU.L vs. ISDU.L

Return for Risk

INAA.L vs. BBSU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
INAA.L
INAA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
INAA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INAA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
INAA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
INAA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
INAA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
BBSU.L
BBSU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
BBSU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBSU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBSU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
BBSU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBSU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INAA.L vs. BBSU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI North America UCITS (INAA.L) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBSU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

INAA.LBBSU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.69
2.70

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.59
3.60

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.50

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.93

3.65

+0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.18

12.74

+1.44

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

INAA.L vs. BBSU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INAA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is comparable to the BBSU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INAA.L and BBSU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

INAA.LBBSU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.69

2.70

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

1.00

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.96

-0.22

Drawdowns

INAA.L vs. BBSU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INAA.L drawdown since its inception was -35.35%, which is greater than BBSU.L's maximum drawdown of -25.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INAA.L and BBSU.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

INAA.LBBSU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.35%

-25.80%

-9.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.24%

-7.80%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.20%

-21.42%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.20%

-21.42%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.15%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-0.17%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.71%

-3.72%

-0.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

2.24%

-0.23%

Volatility

INAA.L vs. BBSU.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI North America UCITS (INAA.L) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBSU.L) have volatilities of 2.63% and 2.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

INAA.LBBSU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

2.64%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.13%

7.21%

-0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.60%

10.54%

+0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.42%

14.45%

-0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.63%

16.10%

-0.47%

INAA.L vs. BBSU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

INAA.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than BBSU.L's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

INAA.L vs. BBSU.L - Dividend Comparison

INAA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, while BBSU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBSU.L
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
INAA.L
iShares MSCI North America UCITS		0.61%0.66%0.76%0.98%1.11%0.74%1.09%1.26%1.40%1.32%1.30%1.51%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.99, INAA.L and BBSU.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, BBSU.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BBSU.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for INAA.L.

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for INAA.L and 0.05% for BBSU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INAA.L and BBSU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer