PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INAA.L vs. VNRT.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

INAA.L vs. VNRT.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI North America UCITS (INAA.L) and Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (VNRT.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

INAA.L vs. VNRT.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INAA.L
iShares MSCI North America UCITS
-2.67%9.48%26.59%19.48%-10.23%28.62%15.54%25.93%-1.17%10.17%
VNRT.AS
Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF
-2.81%10.67%26.96%19.29%-10.17%29.99%15.52%25.48%-0.15%11.19%
Different Trading Currencies

INAA.L is traded in GBp, while VNRT.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the VNRT.AS values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INAA.L achieves a -2.67% return, which is significantly higher than VNRT.AS's -2.81% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with INAA.L having a 14.22% annualized return and VNRT.AS not far ahead at 14.54%.


INAA.L

1D
0.44%
1M
-2.18%
YTD
-2.67%
6M
-0.08%
1Y
15.37%
3Y*
15.54%
5Y*
11.99%
10Y*
14.22%

VNRT.AS

1D
0.45%
1M
-2.13%
YTD
-2.81%
6M
-0.12%
1Y
15.77%
3Y*
15.88%
5Y*
12.30%
10Y*
14.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


INAA.L vs. VNRT.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

INAA.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VNRT.AS's 0.10% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

INAA.L vs. VNRT.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INAA.L
INAA.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
INAA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INAA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
INAA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
INAA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
INAA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

VNRT.AS
VNRT.AS Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
VNRT.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNRT.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNRT.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
VNRT.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNRT.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INAA.L vs. VNRT.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI North America UCITS (INAA.L) and Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (VNRT.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INAA.LVNRT.ASDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.99

0.97

+0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.44

1.41

+0.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.21

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

4.09

-1.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.33

14.38

-4.05

INAA.L vs. VNRT.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INAA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is comparable to the VNRT.AS Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INAA.L and VNRT.AS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INAA.LVNRT.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

0.97

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.82

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

0.83

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.48

+0.22

Correlation

The correlation between INAA.L and VNRT.AS is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

INAA.L vs. VNRT.AS - Dividend Comparison

INAA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than VNRT.AS's 1.00% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INAA.L
iShares MSCI North America UCITS
0.69%0.66%0.76%0.98%1.11%0.74%1.09%1.26%1.40%1.32%1.30%1.51%
VNRT.AS
Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF
1.00%0.98%0.99%1.25%1.45%1.00%1.42%1.44%1.77%1.64%1.58%1.70%

Drawdowns

INAA.L vs. VNRT.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INAA.L drawdown since its inception was -35.35%, which is greater than VNRT.AS's maximum drawdown of -27.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INAA.L and VNRT.AS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


INAA.LVNRT.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.35%

-34.35%

-1.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.24%

-8.12%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.20%

-23.09%

+1.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.15%

-34.35%

+8.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.42%

-4.86%

+0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.75%

-6.01%

+1.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

2.04%

0.00%

Volatility

INAA.L vs. VNRT.AS - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI North America UCITS (INAA.L) and Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (VNRT.AS) have volatilities of 3.67% and 3.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


INAA.LVNRT.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

3.74%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.37%

8.70%

-0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.45%

16.04%

-0.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.50%

14.80%

-0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.66%

17.30%

-1.64%