INAA.L vs. MXUS.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI North America UCITS (INAA.L) and Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (MXUS.L).
INAA.L and MXUS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. INAA.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Jun 2, 2006. MXUS.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Mar 31, 2009. Both INAA.L and MXUS.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: INAA.L or MXUS.L.
Key characteristics
| INAA.L | MXUS.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 24.76% | 26.95% |
| 1Y Return | 31.52% | 39.81% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 10.52% | 9.69% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 15.20% | 16.03% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 14.71% | 13.15% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.79 | 3.28 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.96 | 4.52 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.54 | 1.62 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.89 | 4.87 |
| Martin Ratio | 19.87 | 21.12 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.56% | 1.83% |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.07% | 11.76% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.34% | -34.38% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between INAA.L and MXUS.L is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
INAA.L vs. MXUS.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, INAA.L achieves a 24.76% return, which is significantly lower than MXUS.L's 26.95% return. Over the past 10 years, INAA.L has outperformed MXUS.L with an annualized return of 14.71%, while MXUS.L has yielded a comparatively lower 13.15% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
INAA.L vs. MXUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
INAA.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than MXUS.L's 0.05% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
INAA.L vs. MXUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI North America UCITS (INAA.L) and Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (MXUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
INAA.L vs. MXUS.L - Dividend Comparison
INAA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, while MXUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INAA.L iShares MSCI North America UCITS | 0.77% | 0.98% | 1.11% | 0.74% | 1.09% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.32% | 1.30% | 1.51% | 1.21% | 1.49% |
MXUS.L Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
INAA.L vs. MXUS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INAA.L drawdown since its inception was -35.34%, roughly equal to the maximum MXUS.L drawdown of -34.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INAA.L and MXUS.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
INAA.L vs. MXUS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI North America UCITS (INAA.L) is 3.25%, while Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (MXUS.L) has a volatility of 3.63%. This indicates that INAA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MXUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.