INAA.L vs. BIBDX
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI North America UCITS (INAA.L) and BlackRock Global Dividend Portfolio (BIBDX).
INAA.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Jun 2, 2006. BIBDX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Apr 6, 2008.
Performance
INAA.L vs. BIBDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
INAA.L vs. BIBDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INAA.L iShares MSCI North America UCITS | -3.09% | 9.48% | 26.59% | 19.48% | -10.23% | 28.62% | 15.54% | 25.93% | -1.17% | 10.17% |
BIBDX BlackRock Global Dividend Portfolio | -0.44% | 10.82% | 11.63% | 10.76% | -3.46% | 18.81% | 3.77% | 18.13% | -5.15% | 9.06% |
Different Trading Currencies
INAA.L is traded in GBp, while BIBDX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BIBDX values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INAA.L achieves a -3.09% return, which is significantly lower than BIBDX's -0.44% return. Over the past 10 years, INAA.L has outperformed BIBDX with an annualized return of 14.13%, while BIBDX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.97% annualized return.
INAA.L
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- -3.31%
- YTD
- -3.09%
- 6M
- 0.11%
- 1Y
- 15.02%
- 3Y*
- 15.51%
- 5Y*
- 11.89%
- 10Y*
- 14.13%
BIBDX
- 1D
- 2.63%
- 1M
- -5.58%
- YTD
- -0.44%
- 6M
- 1.18%
- 1Y
- 12.61%
- 3Y*
- 9.21%
- 5Y*
- 8.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.97%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
INAA.L vs. BIBDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
INAA.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than BIBDX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
INAA.L vs. BIBDX — Risk / Return Rank
INAA.L
BIBDX
INAA.L vs. BIBDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI North America UCITS (INAA.L) and BlackRock Global Dividend Portfolio (BIBDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INAA.L | BIBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.97 | 0.85 | +0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.41 | 1.31 | +0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.19 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | 1.33 | +0.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.95 | 5.13 | +1.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INAA.L | BIBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 0.85 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.68 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 | 0.61 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.66 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between INAA.L and BIBDX is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
INAA.L vs. BIBDX - Dividend Comparison
INAA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than BIBDX's 20.61% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INAA.L iShares MSCI North America UCITS | 0.69% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 0.98% | 1.11% | 0.74% | 1.09% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.32% | 1.30% | 1.51% |
BIBDX BlackRock Global Dividend Portfolio | 20.61% | 20.14% | 8.09% | 2.00% | 6.51% | 18.01% | 5.94% | 7.97% | 7.05% | 6.47% | 2.47% | 4.34% |
Drawdowns
INAA.L vs. BIBDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INAA.L drawdown since its inception was -35.35%, which is greater than BIBDX's maximum drawdown of -24.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INAA.L and BIBDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| INAA.L | BIBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.35% | -41.81% | +6.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.70% | -10.80% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.20% | -24.44% | +3.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.15% | -33.15% | +7.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.84% | -7.75% | +2.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.75% | -5.76% | +1.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 2.68% | -0.54% |
Volatility
INAA.L vs. BIBDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI North America UCITS (INAA.L) is 3.80%, while BlackRock Global Dividend Portfolio (BIBDX) has a volatility of 5.25%. This indicates that INAA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIBDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| INAA.L | BIBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.80% | 5.25% | -1.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.37% | 8.74% | -0.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.51% | 15.35% | +0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.50% | 12.57% | +1.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.66% | 14.69% | +0.97% |