BBSU.L vs. XLC
Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBSU.L) and Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC).
BBSU.L and XLC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BBSU.L is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Apr 3, 2019. XLC is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index. It was launched on Jun 18, 2018. Both BBSU.L and XLC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BBSU.L or XLC.
Key characteristics
| BBSU.L | XLC | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 14.57% | 20.20% |
| 1Y Return | 19.59% | 28.28% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 10.63% | 2.18% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 13.48% | 12.13% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.76 | 1.83 |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.54% | 16.42% |
| Max Drawdown | -25.80% | -46.66% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.76% | -1.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBSU.L and XLC is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
BBSU.L vs. XLC - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BBSU.L achieves a 14.57% return, which is significantly lower than XLC's 20.20% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BBSU.L vs. XLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBSU.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than XLC's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BBSU.L vs. XLC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBSU.L) and Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BBSU.L vs. XLC - Dividend Comparison
BBSU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBSU.L JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLC Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund | 0.90% | 0.82% | 1.10% | 0.74% | 0.68% | 0.82% | 0.64% |
Drawdowns
BBSU.L vs. XLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBSU.L drawdown since its inception was -25.80%, smaller than the maximum XLC drawdown of -46.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBSU.L and XLC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BBSU.L vs. XLC - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBSU.L) and Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) have volatilities of 4.33% and 4.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.