PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMTM vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMTM vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMTM achieves a 11.53% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 24.03% return. Over the past 10 years, IMTM has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 10.44%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.19% annualized return.


IMTM

1D
0.72%
1M
0.94%
YTD
11.53%
6M
12.83%
1Y
25.06%
3Y*
21.00%
5Y*
9.19%
10Y*
10.44%

VGT

1D
0.58%
1M
1.35%
YTD
24.03%
6M
24.13%
1Y
50.48%
3Y*
29.84%
5Y*
20.35%
10Y*
25.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMTM vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMTM
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
11.53%34.50%12.17%13.89%-16.81%3.50%22.17%24.52%-14.31%25.46%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
24.03%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between IMTM and VGT is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2015

0.63

The correlation between IMTM and VGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

IMTM vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IMTM
VGT

Financial Services

28.6%
0.5%

Technology

15.6%
98.5%

Industrials

15.5%
0.4%

Energy

10.0%
0.3%

Basic Materials

9.7%
0.0%

Healthcare

8.9%
0.0%

Utilities

5.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.8%
0.1%

Communication Services

1.5%
0.5%

Real Estate

1.1%

-

Financial Services

IMTM
28.6%
VGT
0.5%

Technology

IMTM
15.6%
VGT
98.5%

Industrials

IMTM
15.5%
VGT
0.4%

Energy

IMTM
10.0%
VGT
0.3%

Basic Materials

IMTM
9.7%
VGT
0.0%

Healthcare

IMTM
8.9%
VGT
0.0%

Utilities

IMTM
5.3%
VGT

-

Consumer Defensive

IMTM
2.1%
VGT

-

Consumer Cyclical

IMTM
1.8%
VGT
0.1%

Communication Services

IMTM
1.5%
VGT
0.5%

Real Estate

IMTM
1.1%
VGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMTM vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMTM
IMTM Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
IMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
IMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMTM vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IMTMVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.36

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

2.94

-1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.37

9.11

-1.74

IMTM vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMTM Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMTM and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IMTM vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMTM drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMTM and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMTMVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.66%

-54.63%

+21.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.85%

-16.40%

+3.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.85%

-27.23%

+14.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.66%

-35.07%

+2.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.66%

-35.07%

+2.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-7.18%

+6.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.43%

-7.95%

+0.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

5.28%

-2.04%

Volatility

IMTM vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) is 7.20%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 10.00%. This indicates that IMTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMTMVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.20%

10.00%

-2.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.06%

18.00%

-1.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.97%

22.00%

-4.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.82%

25.40%

-7.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.63%

24.72%

-7.09%

IMTM vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMTM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

IMTM vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

IMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, more than VGT's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMTM
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
4.22%4.70%2.93%2.29%2.68%2.51%0.97%2.13%2.36%1.92%2.75%1.56%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.33%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


IMTM and VGT have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (10.00%) compared to IMTM (7.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMTM dropped -32.66% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.19% vs 10.44% for IMTM. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IMTM has been the lower-risk option at 7.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.19% return vs 10.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IMTM.

IMTM has the higher dividend yield at 4.22%, compared with 0.33% for VGT.

IMTM is categorized as Momentum, while VGT is Technology Equities. IMTM tracks MSCI World ex USA Momentum, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IMTM and 0.09% for VGT.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMTM and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer