IMTM vs. ULVM
IMTM (iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF) and ULVM (VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds - IMTM tracks the MSCI World ex USA Momentum while ULVM tracks the Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IMTM returned 9.00%/yr vs 11.43%/yr for ULVM. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IMTM charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ULVM.
Performance
IMTM vs. ULVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMTM achieves a 11.05% return, which is significantly lower than ULVM's 14.84% return.
IMTM
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 4.43%
- YTD
- 11.05%
- 6M
- 14.04%
- 1Y
- 23.92%
- 3Y*
- 21.55%
- 5Y*
- 9.00%
- 10Y*
- 10.29%
ULVM
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 3.70%
- YTD
- 14.84%
- 6M
- 14.92%
- 1Y
- 28.96%
- 3Y*
- 21.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.43%
- 10Y*
- —
IMTM vs. ULVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMTM iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF | 11.05% | 34.50% | 12.17% | 13.89% | -16.81% | 3.50% | 22.17% | 24.52% | -14.31% | 0.33% |
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF | 14.84% | 15.84% | 19.76% | 10.16% | -9.04% | 31.06% | 3.51% | 22.08% | -12.07% | 4.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMTM and ULVM is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017 | 0.73 |
The correlation between IMTM and ULVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
IMTM vs. ULVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IMTM
ULVM
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Energy
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Financial Services
IMTM
ULVM
Industrials
IMTM
ULVM
Technology
IMTM
ULVM
Energy
IMTM
ULVM
Basic Materials
IMTM
ULVM
Healthcare
IMTM
ULVM
Utilities
IMTM
ULVM
Consumer Defensive
IMTM
ULVM
Communication Services
IMTM
ULVM
Consumer Cyclical
IMTM
ULVM
Real Estate
IMTM
ULVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMTM vs. ULVM — Risk / Return Rank
IMTM
ULVM
IMTM vs. ULVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) and VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IMTM | ULVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.47 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 4.50 | -2.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.46 | 18.64 | -11.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMTM | ULVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | 2.71 | -1.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.74 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.58 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
IMTM vs. ULVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMTM drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, smaller than the maximum ULVM drawdown of -40.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMTM and ULVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMTM | ULVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.66% | -40.71% | +8.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.85% | -6.47% | -6.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.85% | -18.14% | +5.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.66% | -19.77% | -12.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -0.13% | -0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.45% | -5.75% | -1.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | 1.56% | +1.65% |
Volatility
IMTM vs. ULVM - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) has a higher volatility of 5.48% compared to VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) at 2.96%. This indicates that IMTM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ULVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMTM | ULVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.48% | 2.96% | +2.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.98% | 7.97% | +7.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.04% | 10.74% | +6.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.64% | 15.48% | +2.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.64% | 18.86% | -1.22% |
IMTM vs. ULVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMTM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ULVM's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
IMTM vs. ULVM - Dividend Comparison
IMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, more than ULVM's 1.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMTM iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF | 4.23% | 4.70% | 2.93% | 2.29% | 2.68% | 2.51% | 0.97% | 2.13% | 2.36% | 1.92% | 2.75% | 1.56% |
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF | 1.58% | 1.81% | 1.57% | 1.94% | 1.91% | 1.36% | 1.51% | 1.88% | 1.67% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IMTM and ULVM have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IMTM has higher volatility (5.48%) compared to ULVM (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMTM dropped -32.66% vs ULVM's -40.71%.
On 5-year performance, ULVM leads with 11.43% vs 9.00% for IMTM. On fees, ULVM is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ULVM has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ULVM has performed better with a 11.43% return vs 9.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ULVM is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IMTM.
IMTM has the higher dividend yield at 4.23%, compared with 1.58% for ULVM.
IMTM tracks MSCI World ex USA Momentum, while ULVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IMTM and 0.20% for ULVM.
ULVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IMTM and ULVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer