PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMTM vs. ULVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMTM vs. ULVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) and VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMTM achieves a 11.05% return, which is significantly lower than ULVM's 14.84% return.


IMTM

1D
-0.39%
1M
4.43%
YTD
11.05%
6M
14.04%
1Y
23.92%
3Y*
21.55%
5Y*
9.00%
10Y*
10.29%

ULVM

1D
-0.13%
1M
3.70%
YTD
14.84%
6M
14.92%
1Y
28.96%
3Y*
21.27%
5Y*
11.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMTM vs. ULVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMTM
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
11.05%34.50%12.17%13.89%-16.81%3.50%22.17%24.52%-14.31%0.33%
ULVM
VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF
14.84%15.84%19.76%10.16%-9.04%31.06%3.51%22.08%-12.07%4.30%

Correlation

The correlation between IMTM and ULVM is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017

0.73

The correlation between IMTM and ULVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

IMTM vs. ULVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IMTM
ULVM

Financial Services

29.6%
22.5%

Industrials

17.5%
12.2%

Technology

11.4%
13.1%

Energy

9.4%
3.4%

Basic Materials

9.3%
4.1%

Healthcare

9.0%
10.1%

Utilities

6.4%
12.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
4.7%

Communication Services

1.9%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

1.8%
5.3%

Real Estate

1.2%
8.7%

Financial Services

IMTM
29.6%
ULVM
22.5%

Industrials

IMTM
17.5%
ULVM
12.2%

Technology

IMTM
11.4%
ULVM
13.1%

Energy

IMTM
9.4%
ULVM
3.4%

Basic Materials

IMTM
9.3%
ULVM
4.1%

Healthcare

IMTM
9.0%
ULVM
10.1%

Utilities

IMTM
6.4%
ULVM
12.6%

Consumer Defensive

IMTM
2.4%
ULVM
4.7%

Communication Services

IMTM
1.9%
ULVM
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IMTM
1.8%
ULVM
5.3%

Real Estate

IMTM
1.2%
ULVM
8.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMTM vs. ULVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMTM
IMTM Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
IMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
IMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

ULVM
ULVM Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ULVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULVM Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
ULVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMTM vs. ULVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) and VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IMTMULVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.47

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

4.50

-2.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.46

18.64

-11.18

IMTM vs. ULVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMTM Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the ULVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMTM and ULVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMTMULVMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

2.71

-1.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.74

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.58

-0.07

Drawdowns

IMTM vs. ULVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMTM drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, smaller than the maximum ULVM drawdown of -40.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMTM and ULVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMTMULVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.66%

-40.71%

+8.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.85%

-6.47%

-6.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.85%

-18.14%

+5.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.66%

-19.77%

-12.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-0.13%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.45%

-5.75%

-1.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.21%

1.56%

+1.65%

Volatility

IMTM vs. ULVM - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) has a higher volatility of 5.48% compared to VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) at 2.96%. This indicates that IMTM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ULVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMTMULVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.48%

2.96%

+2.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.98%

7.97%

+7.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.04%

10.74%

+6.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.64%

15.48%

+2.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.64%

18.86%

-1.22%

IMTM vs. ULVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMTM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ULVM's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

IMTM vs. ULVM - Dividend Comparison

IMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, more than ULVM's 1.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMTM
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
4.23%4.70%2.93%2.29%2.68%2.51%0.97%2.13%2.36%1.92%2.75%1.56%
ULVM
VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF
1.58%1.81%1.57%1.94%1.91%1.36%1.51%1.88%1.67%0.38%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IMTM and ULVM have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IMTM has higher volatility (5.48%) compared to ULVM (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMTM dropped -32.66% vs ULVM's -40.71%.

On 5-year performance, ULVM leads with 11.43% vs 9.00% for IMTM. On fees, ULVM is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ULVM has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ULVM has performed better with a 11.43% return vs 9.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ULVM is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IMTM.

IMTM has the higher dividend yield at 4.23%, compared with 1.58% for ULVM.

IMTM tracks MSCI World ex USA Momentum, while ULVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IMTM and 0.20% for ULVM.

ULVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMTM and ULVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer