IMTM vs. EFG

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

IMTM (iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF) and EFG (iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IMTM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Momentum, while EFG is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IMTM returned 9.71%/yr vs 8.09%/yr for EFG. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IMTM charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for EFG.

Performance

IMTM vs. EFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) and iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMTM achieves a 8.92% return, which is significantly higher than EFG's 6.44% return. Over the past 10 years, IMTM has outperformed EFG with an annualized return of 9.71%, while EFG has yielded a comparatively lower 8.09% annualized return.

IMTM

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: -1.02%
• YTD: 8.92%
• 6M: 11.17%
• 1Y: 20.71%
• 3Y*: 20.62%
• 5Y*: 8.73%
• 10Y*: 9.71%

EFG

• 1D: 1.13%
• 1M: -1.06%
• YTD: 6.44%
• 6M: 7.52%
• 1Y: 11.82%
• 3Y*: 10.54%
• 5Y*: 3.87%
• 10Y*: 8.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMTM vs. EFG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IMTM iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF	8.92%	34.50%	12.17%	13.89%	-16.81%	3.50%	22.17%	24.52%	-14.31%	25.46%
EFG iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF	6.44%	20.70%	1.53%	17.55%	-23.12%	11.01%	17.85%	27.47%	-12.93%	28.86%

Correlation

The correlation between IMTM and EFG is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2015	0.85

The correlation between IMTM and EFG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

IMTM vs. EFG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IMTM	EFG
Financial Services	29.6%	10.6%
Industrials	17.5%	29.6%
Technology	11.4%	18.1%
Energy	9.4%	0.2%
Basic Materials	9.3%	4.6%
Healthcare	9.0%	14.2%
Utilities	6.4%	1.1%
Consumer Defensive	2.4%	5.1%
Communication Services	1.9%	4.8%
Consumer Cyclical	1.8%	10.7%
Real Estate	1.2%	1.0%

Return for Risk

IMTM vs. EFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMTM

IMTM Risk / Return Rank: 38
IMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
IMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
IMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 37
IMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
IMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 44

EFG

EFG Risk / Return Rank: 23
EFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
EFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
EFG Omega Ratio Rank: 21
EFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
EFG Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMTM vs. EFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) and iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IMTM	EFG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.19	0.68	+0.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.75	1.07	+0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.13	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.62	0.93	+0.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.45	3.41	+3.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IMTM vs. EFG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMTM Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is higher than the EFG Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMTM and EFG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IMTM	EFG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.19	0.68	+0.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	0.21	+0.28
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	0.46	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.29	+0.20

Drawdowns

IMTM vs. EFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMTM drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, smaller than the maximum EFG drawdown of -58.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMTM and EFG.

Drawdown Indicators

	IMTM	EFG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.66%	-58.40%	+25.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.85%	-12.78%	-0.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.85%	-16.87%	+4.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.66%	-35.78%	+3.12%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.66%	-35.78%	+3.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.56%	-2.28%	-0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.44%	-12.15%	+4.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.22%	3.47%	-0.25%

Volatility

IMTM vs. EFG - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) and iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG) have volatilities of 5.93% and 5.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IMTM	EFG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.93%	5.78%	+0.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.47%	14.82%	+0.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.48%	17.48%	0.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.71%	18.18%	-0.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.63%	17.73%	-0.10%

IMTM vs. EFG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMTM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than EFG's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

IMTM vs. EFG - Dividend Comparison

IMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, more than EFG's 2.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EFG iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF	2.37%	2.53%	1.64%	1.63%	1.27%	1.54%	0.85%	1.69%	1.98%	1.56%	2.20%	1.75%
IMTM iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF	4.32%	4.70%	2.93%	2.29%	2.68%	2.51%	0.97%	2.13%	2.36%	1.92%	2.75%	1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IMTM and EFG in my portfolio?

IMTM and EFG have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IMTM or EFG?

IMTM has higher volatility (5.93%) compared to EFG (5.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMTM dropped -32.66% vs EFG's -58.40%.

Which ETF is better, IMTM or EFG?

On 10-year performance, IMTM leads with 9.71% vs 8.09% for EFG. On fees, IMTM is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, EFG has been the lower-risk option at 5.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IMTM or EFG?

Over the 10-year period, IMTM has performed better with a 9.71% return vs 8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IMTM or EFG?

IMTM is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for EFG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IMTM or EFG?

IMTM has the higher dividend yield at 4.32%, compared with 2.37% for EFG.

What is the main difference between IMTM and EFG?

IMTM is categorized as Momentum, while EFG is Foreign Large Cap Equities. IMTM tracks MSCI World ex USA Momentum, while EFG tracks MSCI EAFE Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IMTM and 0.40% for EFG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IMTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.