IMTG vs. SPHD
IMTG (Invesco Agency MBS ETF) and SPHD (Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IMTG is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by Invesco, while SPHD is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. IMTG is actively managed, while SPHD is passively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IMTG charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for SPHD.
Performance
IMTG vs. SPHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IMTG
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPHD
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 2.12%
- YTD
- 9.11%
- 6M
- 8.71%
- 1Y
- 14.03%
- 3Y*
- 12.44%
- 5Y*
- 7.09%
- 10Y*
- 7.82%
IMTG vs. SPHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IMTG Invesco Agency MBS ETF | -0.35% |
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | -0.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMTG and SPHD is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2026 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMTG vs. SPHD — Risk / Return Rank
IMTG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPHD
IMTG vs. SPHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Agency MBS ETF (IMTG) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IMTG | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.92 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.71 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IMTG vs. SPHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMTG drawdown since its inception was -2.85%, smaller than the maximum SPHD drawdown of -41.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMTG and SPHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMTG | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.85% | -41.39% | +38.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -1.08% | +0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.38% | -4.69% | +3.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.98% | — |
Volatility
IMTG vs. SPHD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMTG | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.28% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.72% | 11.48% | -6.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.72% | 14.16% | -9.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.72% | 17.64% | -12.92% |
IMTG vs. SPHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMTG has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than SPHD's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
IMTG vs. SPHD - Dividend Comparison
IMTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than SPHD's 4.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMTG Invesco Agency MBS ETF | 1.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | 4.56% | 4.02% | 3.41% | 4.48% | 3.89% | 3.45% | 4.89% | 4.07% | 4.40% | 3.14% | 3.83% | 3.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IMTG and SPHD have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IMTG is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IMTG is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SPHD.
SPHD has the higher dividend yield at 4.56%, compared with 1.28% for IMTG.
IMTG is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while SPHD is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for IMTG and 0.30% for SPHD.
Find the right allocation for IMTG and SPHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer