IMSU.L vs. VDPG.L

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

IMSU.L (iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and VDPG.L (Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - IMSU.L is a Materials fund tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while VDPG.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IMSU.L returned 6.55%/yr vs 12.82%/yr for VDPG.L. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.

Performance

IMSU.L vs. VDPG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IMSU.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

IMSU.L is traded in GBp, while VDPG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VDPG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMSU.L achieves a 13.42% return, which is significantly lower than VDPG.L's 47.65% return.

IMSU.L

• 1D: 3.01%
• 1M: 0.18%
• YTD: 13.42%
• 6M: 14.88%
• 1Y: 20.12%
• 3Y*: 7.91%
• 5Y*: 6.55%
• 10Y*: —

VDPG.L

• 1D: 4.17%
• 1M: 4.65%
• YTD: 47.65%
• 6M: 52.89%
• 1Y: 79.33%
• 3Y*: 24.13%
• 5Y*: 12.82%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMSU.L vs. VDPG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
IMSU.L iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	13.42%	3.37%	0.69%	6.26%	-1.35%	28.63%	16.34%	-0.68%
VDPG.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc	47.65%	30.58%	-3.06%	4.10%	-1.89%	1.95%	15.56%	-19.58%

Correlation

The correlation between IMSU.L and VDPG.L is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.48
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2019	0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between IMSU.L and VDPG.L has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IMSU.L vs. VDPG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IMSU.L	VDPG.L
Basic Materials	91.4%	9.5%
Consumer Cyclical	8.6%	5.3%
Communication Services	-	2.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.5%
Energy	-	2.3%
Financial Services	-	25.3%
Healthcare	-	3.3%
Industrials	-	12.5%
Real Estate	-	4.9%
Technology	-	30.2%
Utilities	-	2.0%

Return for Risk

IMSU.L vs. VDPG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMSU.L

IMSU.L Risk / Return Rank: 41
IMSU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
IMSU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
IMSU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 39
IMSU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
IMSU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 42

VDPG.L

VDPG.L Risk / Return Rank: 94
VDPG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
VDPG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
VDPG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 95
VDPG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
VDPG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMSU.L vs. VDPG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IMSU.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IMSU.L	VDPG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.33	3.62	-2.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.94	4.28	-2.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.65	-0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.86	5.87	-4.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.07	20.42	-14.35

IMSU.L vs. VDPG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMSU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the VDPG.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMSU.L and VDPG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IMSU.L vs. VDPG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMSU.L drawdown since its inception was -33.22%, smaller than the maximum VDPG.L drawdown of -40.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMSU.L and VDPG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	IMSU.L	VDPG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.22%	-40.69%	+7.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.76%	-13.45%	+2.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.16%	-26.18%	+1.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.16%	-26.18%	+1.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.70%	-4.74%	+2.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.19%	-11.24%	+0.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.31%	3.87%	-0.56%

Volatility

IMSU.L vs. VDPG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IMSU.L) is 5.66%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) has a volatility of 11.04%. This indicates that IMSU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VDPG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IMSU.L	VDPG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.66%	11.04%	-5.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.26%	19.69%	-7.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.12%	21.82%	-6.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.54%	21.25%	+0.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.98%	23.27%	+1.71%

IMSU.L vs. VDPG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IMSU.L and VDPG.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IMSU.L vs. VDPG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IMSU.L nor VDPG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IMSU.L and VDPG.L in my portfolio?

IMSU.L and VDPG.L have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IMSU.L or VDPG.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IMSU.L or VDPG.L?

IMSU.L and VDPG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

What is the main difference between IMSU.L and VDPG.L?

IMSU.L is categorized as Materials, while VDPG.L is Asia Pacific Equities. IMSU.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while VDPG.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard.