IMSU.L vs. VWRA.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IMSU.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L).
IMSU.L and VWRA.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IMSU.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Materials NR USD. It was launched on Mar 20, 2017. VWRA.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Jul 23, 2019. Both IMSU.L and VWRA.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IMSU.L vs. VWRA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IMSU.L vs. VWRA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMSU.L iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 11.43% | 3.37% | 0.69% | 6.26% | -1.35% | 28.63% | 16.34% | -1.96% |
VWRA.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 0.17% | 13.73% | 19.70% | 16.17% | -8.37% | 19.58% | 12.78% | 0.12% |
Different Trading Currencies
IMSU.L is traded in GBp, while VWRA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VWRA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMSU.L achieves a 11.43% return, which is significantly higher than VWRA.L's -2.38% return.
IMSU.L
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- -4.24%
- YTD
- 11.43%
- 6M
- 14.29%
- 1Y
- 15.31%
- 3Y*
- 6.98%
- 5Y*
- 7.55%
- 10Y*
- —
VWRA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.37%
- YTD
- -2.38%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- 15.88%
- 3Y*
- 13.77%
- 5Y*
- 10.07%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IMSU.L vs. VWRA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMSU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than VWRA.L's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
IMSU.L vs. VWRA.L — Risk / Return Rank
IMSU.L
VWRA.L
IMSU.L vs. VWRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IMSU.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IMSU.L | VWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.90 | 1.11 | -0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.30 | 1.53 | -0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.23 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 2.34 | -0.94 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.08 | 8.41 | -3.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMSU.L | VWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 1.11 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.72 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.63 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between IMSU.L and VWRA.L is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
IMSU.L vs. VWRA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IMSU.L nor VWRA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
IMSU.L vs. VWRA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMSU.L drawdown since its inception was -28.25%, which is greater than VWRA.L's maximum drawdown of -25.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMSU.L and VWRA.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMSU.L | VWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.25% | -33.62% | +5.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.29% | -11.49% | -0.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.70% | -26.06% | +4.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.40% | -5.56% | +1.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.58% | -5.50% | -0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 2.21% | +0.77% |
Volatility
IMSU.L vs. VWRA.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IMSU.L) has a higher volatility of 6.92% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) at 4.83%. This indicates that IMSU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWRA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IMSU.L | VWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.92% | 4.83% | +2.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.61% | 8.76% | +2.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.93% | 14.35% | +2.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 13.95% | +2.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.52% | 16.06% | +2.46% |