IMSU.L vs. BYBU.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IMSU.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBU.L).
IMSU.L and BYBU.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IMSU.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Materials NR USD. It was launched on Mar 20, 2017. BYBU.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Buyback NTR. It was launched on Jan 31, 2018. Both IMSU.L and BYBU.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IMSU.L vs. BYBU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IMSU.L vs. BYBU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMSU.L iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 11.43% | 3.37% | 0.69% | 6.26% | -1.35% | 28.63% | 16.34% | 19.09% | -10.83% | 7.66% |
BYBU.L Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD | 1.13% | 9.02% | 16.67% | 10.84% | -3.19% | 37.48% | 2.26% | 25.34% | -0.50% | 4.46% |
Different Trading Currencies
IMSU.L is traded in GBp, while BYBU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BYBU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMSU.L achieves a 11.43% return, which is significantly higher than BYBU.L's 1.13% return.
IMSU.L
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- -4.24%
- YTD
- 11.43%
- 6M
- 14.29%
- 1Y
- 15.31%
- 3Y*
- 6.98%
- 5Y*
- 7.55%
- 10Y*
- —
BYBU.L
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- -1.35%
- YTD
- 1.13%
- 6M
- 3.94%
- 1Y
- 14.82%
- 3Y*
- 12.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.35%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IMSU.L vs. BYBU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IMSU.L and BYBU.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
IMSU.L vs. BYBU.L — Risk / Return Rank
IMSU.L
BYBU.L
IMSU.L vs. BYBU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IMSU.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IMSU.L | BYBU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.90 | 0.92 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.30 | 1.33 | -0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.18 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 1.41 | 0.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.08 | 6.09 | -1.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMSU.L | BYBU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 0.92 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.90 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 1.16 | -0.69 |
Correlation
The correlation between IMSU.L and BYBU.L is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
IMSU.L vs. BYBU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IMSU.L nor BYBU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
IMSU.L vs. BYBU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMSU.L drawdown since its inception was -28.25%, which is greater than BYBU.L's maximum drawdown of -23.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMSU.L and BYBU.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMSU.L | BYBU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.25% | -28.64% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.29% | -12.03% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.70% | -22.11% | +0.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.40% | -3.80% | -0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.58% | -5.02% | -0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 2.71% | +0.27% |
Volatility
IMSU.L vs. BYBU.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IMSU.L) has a higher volatility of 6.92% compared to Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBU.L) at 4.21%. This indicates that IMSU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BYBU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IMSU.L | BYBU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.92% | 4.21% | +2.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.61% | 9.14% | +2.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.93% | 16.54% | +0.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 20.17% | -3.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.52% | 25.69% | -7.17% |