IMRA vs. CRSH
Compare and contrast key facts about Bitwise MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (IMRA) and YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH).
IMRA and CRSH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IMRA is an actively managed fund by Bitwise. It was launched on Apr 1, 2025. CRSH is an actively managed fund by YieldMax. It was launched on May 1, 2024.
Performance
IMRA vs. CRSH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IMRA vs. CRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IMRA Bitwise MARA Option Income Strategy ETF | -7.13% | -33.37% |
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 18.37% | -36.28% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMRA achieves a -7.13% return, which is significantly lower than CRSH's 18.37% return.
IMRA
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -12.78%
- YTD
- -7.13%
- 6M
- -51.26%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRSH
- 1D
- -1.76%
- 1M
- 6.01%
- YTD
- 18.37%
- 6M
- 24.09%
- 1Y
- -24.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IMRA vs. CRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMRA has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than CRSH's 0.99% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IMRA vs. CRSH — Risk / Return Rank
IMRA
CRSH
IMRA vs. CRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (IMRA) and YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMRA | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.60 | -0.64 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between IMRA and CRSH is -0.36. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
IMRA vs. CRSH - Dividend Comparison
IMRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 220.19%, more than CRSH's 100.61% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IMRA Bitwise MARA Option Income Strategy ETF | 220.19% | 188.74% | 0.00% |
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 100.61% | 138.78% | 94.25% |
Drawdowns
IMRA vs. CRSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMRA drawdown since its inception was -61.55%, roughly equal to the maximum CRSH drawdown of -63.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMRA and CRSH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMRA | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.55% | -63.68% | +2.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -48.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.73% | -53.43% | -4.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.08% | -41.91% | +16.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 35.23% | — |
Volatility
IMRA vs. CRSH - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IMRA | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.04% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.47% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.50% | 42.40% | +22.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.50% | 48.37% | +16.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.50% | 48.37% | +16.13% |