IMRA vs. OWNB
Compare and contrast key facts about Bitwise MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (IMRA) and Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF (OWNB).
IMRA and OWNB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IMRA is an actively managed fund by Bitwise. It was launched on Apr 1, 2025. OWNB is a passively managed fund by Bitwise that tracks the performance of the Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations Inde. It was launched on Mar 10, 2025.
Performance
IMRA vs. OWNB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IMRA vs. OWNB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IMRA Bitwise MARA Option Income Strategy ETF | -6.91% | -33.37% |
OWNB Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF | -23.72% | 0.21% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMRA achieves a -6.91% return, which is significantly higher than OWNB's -23.72% return.
IMRA
- 1D
- 4.17%
- 1M
- -11.74%
- YTD
- -6.91%
- 6M
- -50.72%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OWNB
- 1D
- 6.03%
- 1M
- -9.07%
- YTD
- -23.72%
- 6M
- -50.60%
- 1Y
- -24.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IMRA vs. OWNB - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMRA has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than OWNB's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IMRA vs. OWNB — Risk / Return Rank
IMRA
OWNB
IMRA vs. OWNB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (IMRA) and Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF (OWNB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMRA | OWNB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.60 | -0.39 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between IMRA and OWNB is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IMRA vs. OWNB - Dividend Comparison
IMRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 219.65%, more than OWNB's 1.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IMRA Bitwise MARA Option Income Strategy ETF | 219.65% | 188.74% |
OWNB Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF | 1.14% | 0.87% |
Drawdowns
IMRA vs. OWNB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMRA drawdown since its inception was -61.55%, roughly equal to the maximum OWNB drawdown of -59.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMRA and OWNB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMRA | OWNB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.55% | -59.47% | -2.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -59.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.63% | -57.02% | -0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.95% | -21.51% | -3.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 28.43% | — |
Volatility
IMRA vs. OWNB - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IMRA | OWNB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 19.11% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 46.88% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.63% | 63.74% | +0.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.63% | 64.37% | +0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.63% | 64.37% | +0.26% |