IMMR vs. KOS
IMMR (Immersion Corporation) and KOS (Kosmos Energy Ltd.) are both stocks. IMMR operates in Software - Application (Technology), while KOS operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 10 years, IMMR returned 2.90%/yr vs -7.22%/yr for KOS. Their 0.22 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
IMMR vs. KOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMMR achieves a 13.87% return, which is significantly lower than KOS's 178.82% return. Over the past 10 years, IMMR has outperformed KOS with an annualized return of 2.90%, while KOS has yielded a comparatively lower -7.22% annualized return.
IMMR
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- 11.58%
- 6M
- 12.24%
- YTD
- 13.87%
- 1Y
- 14.44%
- 3Y*
- 5.68%
- 5Y*
- 3.17%
- 10Y*
- 2.90%
- ALL TIME*
- -2.62%
KOS
- 1D
- -5.95%
- 1M
- 22.22%
- 6M
- 86.03%
- YTD
- 178.82%
- 1Y
- 29.74%
- 3Y*
- -29.79%
- 5Y*
- 4.30%
- 10Y*
- -7.22%
- ALL TIME*
- -12.28%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.48M | $4.90M | $4.16M | |
| $36.73M | $41.18M | $37.82M |
IMMR vs. KOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMMR Immersion Corporation | 13.87% | -18.30% | 26.47% | 3.43% | 23.12% | -49.42% | 51.95% | -17.08% | 26.91% | -33.58% |
KOS Kosmos Energy Ltd. | 178.82% | -73.47% | -49.03% | 5.50% | 83.82% | 47.23% | -58.06% | 44.22% | -40.58% | -2.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMMR and KOS is -0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2011 | 0.22 |
The correlation between IMMR and KOS shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
IMMR:
$248.28M
KOS:
$1.23B
IMMR:
$0.14
KOS:
-$1.05
IMMR:
0.14
KOS:
0.80
IMMR:
0.83
KOS:
2.17
IMMR:
$1.73B
KOS:
$1.64B
IMMR:
$360.34M
KOS:
$591.21M
IMMR:
$78.13M
KOS:
$206.50M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMMR vs. KOS — Risk / Return Rank
IMMR
KOS
IMMR vs. KOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Immersion Corporation (IMMR) and Kosmos Energy Ltd. (KOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IMMR | KOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.13 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.59 | 0.55 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.33 | 1.23 | +0.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IMMR vs. KOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMMR drawdown since its inception was -98.66%, roughly equal to the maximum KOS drawdown of -97.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMMR and KOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMMR | KOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.66% | -97.15% | -1.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.77% | -54.17% | +29.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.90% | -89.39% | +32.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.90% | -89.82% | +32.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.29% | -94.28% | +19.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -88.26% | -86.41% | -1.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.21% | -65.24% | -22.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.86% | 25.10% | -14.24% |
Volatility
IMMR vs. KOS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Immersion Corporation (IMMR) is 19.81%, while Kosmos Energy Ltd. (KOS) has a volatility of 28.03%. This indicates that IMMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMMR | KOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.81% | 28.03% | -8.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.99% | 70.57% | -37.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.92% | 88.45% | -44.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.42% | 70.38% | -23.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.29% | 77.49% | -26.20% |
Dividends
IMMR vs. KOS - Dividend Comparison
IMMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, while KOS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMMR Immersion Corporation | 3.61% | 5.59% | 2.06% | 3.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KOS Kosmos Energy Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.92% | 3.17% |
Financials
IMMR vs. KOS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Immersion Corporation and Kosmos Energy Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
IMMR vs. KOS - Profitability Comparison
IMMR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Immersion Corporation reported a gross profit of 73.93M and revenue of 270.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.
KOS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kosmos Energy Ltd. reported a gross profit of 427.82M and revenue of 607.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.5%.
IMMR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Immersion Corporation reported an operating income of 147.00K and revenue of 270.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.1%.
KOS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kosmos Energy Ltd. reported an operating income of 272.69M and revenue of 607.25M, resulting in an operating margin of 44.9%.
IMMR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Immersion Corporation reported a net income of 3.73M and revenue of 270.00M, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.
KOS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kosmos Energy Ltd. reported a net income of 184.78M and revenue of 607.25M, resulting in a net margin of 30.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
IMMR and KOS have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KOS has higher volatility (28.03%) compared to IMMR (19.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMMR dropped -98.66% vs KOS's -97.15%.
KOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.34 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IMMR and KOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer