IMG.TO vs. RUD.TO

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

IMG.TO (IAMGOLD Corporation) is a stock, while RUD.TO (RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD)) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by RBC. Over the past 10 years, IMG.TO returned 12.45%/yr vs 16.58%/yr for RUD.TO. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

IMG.TO vs. RUD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in IAMGOLD Corporation (IMG.TO) and RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD) (RUD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMG.TO achieves a -13.33% return, which is significantly lower than RUD.TO's 12.22% return. Over the past 10 years, IMG.TO has underperformed RUD.TO with an annualized return of 12.45%, while RUD.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 16.58% annualized return.

IMG.TO

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: -17.38%
• 6M: -25.30%
• YTD: -13.33%
• 1Y: 107.29%
• 3Y*: 73.79%
• 5Y*: 40.86%
• 10Y*: 12.45%
• ALL TIME*: 3.19%

RUD.TO

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 0.54%
• 6M: 9.14%
• YTD: 12.22%
• 1Y: 20.25%
• 3Y*: 17.82%
• 5Y*: 15.62%
• 10Y*: 16.58%
• ALL TIME*: 17.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMG.TO vs. RUD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IMG.TO IAMGOLD Corporation	-13.33%	204.85%	122.46%	-3.75%	-11.93%	-15.63%	-3.71%	-3.19%	-31.65%	41.23%
RUD.TO RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD)	12.22%	7.35%	25.76%	23.90%	-15.14%	54.34%	13.61%	25.93%	6.03%	14.39%

Correlation

The correlation between IMG.TO and RUD.TO is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.11
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2014	-0.00

The correlation between IMG.TO and RUD.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (all time) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

IMG.TO vs. RUD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMG.TO

IMG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 85
IMG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
IMG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
IMG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 83
IMG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
IMG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 82

RUD.TO

RUD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 72
RUD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
RUD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
RUD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 69
RUD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
RUD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMG.TO vs. RUD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IAMGOLD Corporation (IMG.TO) and RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD) (RUD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IMG.TO	RUD.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	1.64	+0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.23	2.27	-0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.30	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.60	3.06	-0.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.79	10.87	-5.09

IMG.TO vs. RUD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the RUD.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMG.TO and RUD.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IMG.TO vs. RUD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMG.TO drawdown since its inception was -93.93%, which is greater than RUD.TO's maximum drawdown of -35.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMG.TO and RUD.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	IMG.TO	RUD.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.93%	-35.99%	-57.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.51%	-6.65%	-34.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-41.51%	-28.31%	-13.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-71.43%	-28.31%	-43.12%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-84.65%	-35.99%	-48.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-41.51%	-1.03%	-40.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-59.33%	-10.03%	-49.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.61%	1.87%	+16.74%

Volatility

IMG.TO vs. RUD.TO - Volatility Comparison

IAMGOLD Corporation (IMG.TO) has a higher volatility of 14.51% compared to RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD) (RUD.TO) at 2.54%. This indicates that IMG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RUD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IMG.TO	RUD.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.51%	2.54%	+11.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.99%	9.39%	+38.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.32%	12.42%	+48.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	58.08%	34.43%	+23.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	56.29%	44.71%	+11.58%

Dividends

IMG.TO vs. RUD.TO - Dividend Comparison

IMG.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RUD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IMG.TO IAMGOLD Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RUD.TO RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD)	1.36%	1.38%	3.43%	5.24%	5.51%	3.38%	5.73%	6.77%	7.06%	6.23%	6.07%	7.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IMG.TO and RUD.TO in my portfolio?

IMG.TO and RUD.TO have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.