IMG.TO vs. ABX.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about IAMGOLD Corporation (IMG.TO) and Barrick Gold Corporation (ABX.TO).
Performance
IMG.TO vs. ABX.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IMG.TO vs. ABX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMG.TO IAMGOLD Corporation | 15.50% | 204.85% | 122.46% | -3.75% | -11.93% | -15.63% | -3.71% | -3.19% | -31.65% | 41.23% |
ABX.TO Barrick Gold Corporation | -4.12% | 173.90% | -4.69% | 5.66% | 0.12% | -13.90% | 21.80% | 32.27% | 2.91% | -14.68% |
Fundamentals
IMG.TO:
CA$15.20B
ABX.TO:
CA$95.74B
IMG.TO:
CA$1.15
ABX.TO:
CA$2.99
IMG.TO:
22.66
ABX.TO:
19.03
IMG.TO:
0.12
ABX.TO:
0.22
IMG.TO:
5.30
ABX.TO:
5.69
IMG.TO:
3.63
ABX.TO:
3.61
IMG.TO:
CA$2.87B
ABX.TO:
CA$16.99B
IMG.TO:
CA$1.21B
ABX.TO:
CA$8.53B
IMG.TO:
CA$1.51B
ABX.TO:
CA$11.10B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMG.TO achieves a 15.50% return, which is significantly higher than ABX.TO's -4.12% return. Over the past 10 years, IMG.TO has outperformed ABX.TO with an annualized return of 24.43%, while ABX.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 14.62% annualized return.
IMG.TO
- 1D
- 7.26%
- 1M
- -22.05%
- YTD
- 15.50%
- 6M
- 45.49%
- 1Y
- 191.31%
- 3Y*
- 92.10%
- 5Y*
- 46.03%
- 10Y*
- 24.43%
ABX.TO
- 1D
- 6.26%
- 1M
- -17.86%
- YTD
- -4.12%
- 6M
- 25.96%
- 1Y
- 108.34%
- 3Y*
- 34.47%
- 5Y*
- 20.81%
- 10Y*
- 14.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMG.TO vs. ABX.TO — Risk / Return Rank
IMG.TO
ABX.TO
IMG.TO vs. ABX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IAMGOLD Corporation (IMG.TO) and Barrick Gold Corporation (ABX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IMG.TO | ABX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.19 | 2.52 | +0.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.13 | 2.77 | +0.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.40 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.57 | 3.95 | +1.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.49 | 14.27 | +2.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMG.TO | ABX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.19 | 2.52 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.62 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.41 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.30 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between IMG.TO and ABX.TO is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
IMG.TO vs. ABX.TO - Dividend Comparison
IMG.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ABX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMG.TO IAMGOLD Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ABX.TO Barrick Gold Corporation | 2.05% | 1.23% | 2.45% | 2.27% | 3.64% | 4.06% | 1.42% | 0.92% | 1.36% | 1.02% | 0.59% | 1.93% |
Drawdowns
IMG.TO vs. ABX.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMG.TO drawdown since its inception was -93.92%, which is greater than ABX.TO's maximum drawdown of -84.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMG.TO and ABX.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMG.TO | ABX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.92% | -84.49% | -9.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.15% | -28.49% | -5.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -71.43% | -43.76% | -27.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.65% | -56.55% | -28.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.05% | -20.22% | -1.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.78% | -31.46% | -19.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.55% | 7.89% | +3.66% |
Volatility
IMG.TO vs. ABX.TO - Volatility Comparison
IAMGOLD Corporation (IMG.TO) has a higher volatility of 19.92% compared to Barrick Gold Corporation (ABX.TO) at 15.86%. This indicates that IMG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IMG.TO | ABX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.92% | 15.86% | +4.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.53% | 34.38% | +12.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.28% | 43.25% | +17.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.07% | 33.75% | +23.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.78% | 36.22% | +20.56% |
Financials
IMG.TO vs. ABX.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between IAMGOLD Corporation and Barrick Gold Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
IMG.TO vs. ABX.TO - Profitability Comparison
IMG.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported a gross profit of 595.72M and revenue of 1.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.9%.
ABX.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Barrick Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.12B and revenue of 6.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.8%.
IMG.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported an operating income of 576.53M and revenue of 1.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 52.2%.
ABX.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Barrick Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 3.06B and revenue of 6.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 50.7%.
IMG.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported a net income of 412.85M and revenue of 1.10B, resulting in a net margin of 37.4%.
ABX.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Barrick Gold Corporation reported a net income of 2.49B and revenue of 6.03B, resulting in a net margin of 41.3%.