IMG.TO vs. KNT.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about IAMGOLD Corporation (IMG.TO) and K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.TO).

Performance

IMG.TO vs. KNT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in IAMGOLD Corporation (IMG.TO) and K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IMG.TO vs. KNT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IMG.TO IAMGOLD Corporation	15.50%	204.85%	122.46%	-3.75%	-11.93%	-15.63%	-3.71%	-3.19%	-31.65%	41.23%
KNT.TO K92 Mining Inc.	4.05%	161.41%	33.33%	-15.12%	6.68%	-5.52%	164.24%	242.86%	55.56%	-44.33%

Fundamentals

Market Cap IMG.TO : CA$15.20B KNT.TO : CA$5.91B
EPS IMG.TO : CA$1.15 KNT.TO : CA$1.10
PE Ratio IMG.TO : 22.66 KNT.TO : 21.53
PEG Ratio IMG.TO : 0.12 KNT.TO : 0.22
PS Ratio IMG.TO : 5.30 KNT.TO : 9.77
PB Ratio IMG.TO : 3.63 KNT.TO : 7.71
Total Revenue (TTM) IMG.TO : CA$2.87B KNT.TO : CA$597.97M
Gross Profit (TTM) IMG.TO : CA$1.21B KNT.TO : CA$434.80M
EBITDA (TTM) IMG.TO : CA$1.51B KNT.TO : CA$430.99M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMG.TO achieves a 15.50% return, which is significantly higher than KNT.TO's 4.05% return. Over the past 10 years, IMG.TO has underperformed KNT.TO with an annualized return of 24.43%, while KNT.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 44.38% annualized return.

IMG.TO

• 1D: 7.26%
• 1M: -22.05%
• YTD: 15.50%
• 6M: 45.49%
• 1Y: 191.31%
• 3Y*: 92.10%
• 5Y*: 46.03%
• 10Y*: 24.43%

KNT.TO

• 1D: 5.78%
• 1M: -28.19%
• YTD: 4.05%
• 6M: 40.37%
• 1Y: 90.25%
• 3Y*: 45.40%
• 5Y*: 28.38%
• 10Y*: 44.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

IMG.TO vs. KNT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMG.TO

IMG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 94
IMG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
IMG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
IMG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 92
IMG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
IMG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 95

KNT.TO

KNT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 86
KNT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
KNT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
KNT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 84
KNT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
KNT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMG.TO vs. KNT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IAMGOLD Corporation (IMG.TO) and K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IMG.TO	KNT.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.19	1.91	+1.29
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.13	2.23	+0.90
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.32	+0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.57	2.53	+3.05
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.49	9.79	+6.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IMG.TO vs. KNT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.19, which is higher than the KNT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMG.TO and KNT.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IMG.TO	KNT.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.19	1.91	+1.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81	0.59	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43	0.72	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.10	0.44	-0.34

Correlation

The correlation between IMG.TO and KNT.TO is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

IMG.TO vs. KNT.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither IMG.TO nor KNT.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

IMG.TO vs. KNT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMG.TO drawdown since its inception was -93.92%, which is greater than KNT.TO's maximum drawdown of -82.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMG.TO and KNT.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	IMG.TO	KNT.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.92%	-82.00%	-11.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.15%	-38.35%	+4.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-71.43%	-54.53%	-16.90%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-84.65%	-80.47%	-4.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.05%	-28.82%	+6.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.78%	-36.52%	-14.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.55%	9.90%	+1.65%

Volatility

IMG.TO vs. KNT.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IAMGOLD Corporation (IMG.TO) is 19.92%, while K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.TO) has a volatility of 21.13%. This indicates that IMG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KNT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IMG.TO	KNT.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.92%	21.13%	-1.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.53%	40.41%	+6.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	60.28%	47.63%	+12.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	57.07%	48.58%	+8.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	56.78%	61.96%	-5.18%

Financials

IMG.TO vs. KNT.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between IAMGOLD Corporation and K92 Mining Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

IMG.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported a gross profit of 595.72M and revenue of 1.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.9%.

KNT.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, K92 Mining Inc. reported a gross profit of 126.61M and revenue of 179.47M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.6%.

IMG.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported an operating income of 576.53M and revenue of 1.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 52.2%.

KNT.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, K92 Mining Inc. reported an operating income of 122.01M and revenue of 179.47M, resulting in an operating margin of 68.0%.

IMG.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported a net income of 412.85M and revenue of 1.10B, resulting in a net margin of 37.4%.

KNT.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, K92 Mining Inc. reported a net income of 76.24M and revenue of 179.47M, resulting in a net margin of 42.5%.