RUD.TO vs. XGRO.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD) (RUD.TO) and iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO).
RUD.TO and XGRO.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RUD.TO is an actively managed fund by RBC. It was launched on Jan 9, 2014. XGRO.TO is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Jun 21, 2007.
Performance
RUD.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RUD.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RUD.TO RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD) | -0.58% | 7.31% | 22.78% | 19.01% | -7.35% | 31.62% | 8.82% | 19.60% | 1.05% | 9.17% |
XGRO.TO iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio | 0.51% | 15.59% | 19.53% | 15.01% | -11.08% | 14.29% | 11.51% | 17.97% | -6.73% | 11.61% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RUD.TO achieves a -0.58% return, which is significantly lower than XGRO.TO's 0.51% return. Over the past 10 years, RUD.TO has outperformed XGRO.TO with an annualized return of 12.10%, while XGRO.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 9.49% annualized return.
RUD.TO
- 1D
- 2.07%
- 1M
- -2.35%
- YTD
- -0.58%
- 6M
- -1.37%
- 1Y
- 11.64%
- 3Y*
- 14.50%
- 5Y*
- 11.91%
- 10Y*
- 12.10%
XGRO.TO
- 1D
- 2.22%
- 1M
- -3.88%
- YTD
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 1.47%
- 1Y
- 15.73%
- 3Y*
- 14.73%
- 5Y*
- 9.23%
- 10Y*
- 9.49%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RUD.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
RUD.TO has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than XGRO.TO's 0.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RUD.TO vs. XGRO.TO — Risk / Return Rank
RUD.TO
XGRO.TO
RUD.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD) (RUD.TO) and iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RUD.TO | XGRO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.63 | 1.17 | -0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.98 | 1.66 | -0.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.25 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | 1.65 | -0.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.08 | 7.36 | -3.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RUD.TO | XGRO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 | 1.17 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.85 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.33 | +0.44 |
Correlation
The correlation between RUD.TO and XGRO.TO is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RUD.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Dividend Comparison
RUD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than XGRO.TO's 1.93% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RUD.TO RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD) | 1.42% | 1.35% | 1.16% | 1.49% | 1.57% | 1.10% | 1.64% | 1.93% | 2.01% | 1.78% | 1.73% | 2.12% |
XGRO.TO iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio | 1.93% | 1.92% | 1.98% | 2.22% | 1.86% | 1.66% | 1.94% | 2.21% | 7.42% | 2.04% | 2.65% | 2.15% |
Drawdowns
RUD.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RUD.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.89%, smaller than the maximum XGRO.TO drawdown of -47.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RUD.TO and XGRO.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RUD.TO | XGRO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.89% | -47.97% | +18.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.79% | -9.78% | -3.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.33% | -18.40% | -9.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.89% | -25.85% | -4.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.63% | -4.37% | -4.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.99% | -8.56% | +4.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 2.20% | +0.97% |
Volatility
RUD.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD) (RUD.TO) is 4.83%, while iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO) has a volatility of 6.06%. This indicates that RUD.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XGRO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RUD.TO | XGRO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.83% | 6.06% | -1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.12% | 8.59% | +1.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.61% | 13.49% | +5.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.39% | 10.89% | +4.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.55% | 12.20% | +3.35% |