PortfoliosLab logo
IMG.TO vs. FRU.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between IMG.TO and FRU.TO is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

IMG.TO vs. FRU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IAMGOLD Corporation (IMG.TO) and Freehold Royalties Ltd. (FRU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

IMG.TO:

0.72

FRU.TO:

-0.04

Sortino Ratio

IMG.TO:

1.43

FRU.TO:

0.09

Omega Ratio

IMG.TO:

1.18

FRU.TO:

1.01

Calmar Ratio

IMG.TO:

0.59

FRU.TO:

-0.06

Martin Ratio

IMG.TO:

4.31

FRU.TO:

-0.17

Ulcer Index

IMG.TO:

10.58%

FRU.TO:

8.63%

Daily Std Dev

IMG.TO:

57.75%

FRU.TO:

24.68%

Max Drawdown

IMG.TO:

-93.92%

FRU.TO:

-86.95%

Current Drawdown

IMG.TO:

-61.19%

FRU.TO:

-13.20%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IMG.TO:

CA$5.08B

FRU.TO:

CA$1.99B

EPS

IMG.TO:

CA$2.04

FRU.TO:

CA$0.98

PE Ratio

IMG.TO:

4.33

FRU.TO:

12.37

PEG Ratio

IMG.TO:

31.73

FRU.TO:

-2.97

PS Ratio

IMG.TO:

2.87

FRU.TO:

6.42

PB Ratio

IMG.TO:

1.07

FRU.TO:

1.81

Total Revenue (TTM)

IMG.TO:

CA$1.77B

FRU.TO:

CA$235.21M

Gross Profit (TTM)

IMG.TO:

CA$585.40M

FRU.TO:

CA$153.10M

EBITDA (TTM)

IMG.TO:

CA$891.30M

FRU.TO:

CA$139.59M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMG.TO achieves a 15.07% return, which is significantly higher than FRU.TO's 0.84% return. Over the past 10 years, IMG.TO has outperformed FRU.TO with an annualized return of 11.92%, while FRU.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 2.96% annualized return.


IMG.TO

YTD

15.07%

1M

-15.35%

6M

22.32%

1Y

41.09%

5Y*

9.45%

10Y*

11.92%

FRU.TO

YTD

0.84%

1M

12.24%

6M

-5.13%

1Y

-1.01%

5Y*

37.55%

10Y*

2.96%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

IMG.TO vs. FRU.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMG.TO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IMG.TO is 7777
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IMG.TO is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IMG.TO is 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IMG.TO is 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IMG.TO is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IMG.TO is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

FRU.TO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FRU.TO is 4444
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FRU.TO is 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FRU.TO is 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FRU.TO is 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FRU.TO is 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FRU.TO is 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IMG.TO vs. FRU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IAMGOLD Corporation (IMG.TO) and Freehold Royalties Ltd. (FRU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current IMG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is higher than the FRU.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMG.TO and FRU.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

IMG.TO vs. FRU.TO - Dividend Comparison

IMG.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FRU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.62%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
IMG.TO
IAMGOLD Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FRU.TO
Freehold Royalties Ltd.
8.62%8.44%7.89%6.13%4.21%5.71%8.64%7.56%4.13%3.81%9.21%8.79%

Drawdowns

IMG.TO vs. FRU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMG.TO drawdown since its inception was -93.92%, which is greater than FRU.TO's maximum drawdown of -86.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMG.TO and FRU.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

IMG.TO vs. FRU.TO - Volatility Comparison

IAMGOLD Corporation (IMG.TO) has a higher volatility of 18.93% compared to Freehold Royalties Ltd. (FRU.TO) at 6.71%. This indicates that IMG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

IMG.TO vs. FRU.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between IAMGOLD Corporation and Freehold Royalties Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-100.00M0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M20212022202320242025
477.10M
76.86M
(IMG.TO) Total Revenue
(FRU.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

IMG.TO vs. FRU.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between IAMGOLD Corporation and Freehold Royalties Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20212022202320242025
29.6%
62.1%
(IMG.TO) Gross Margin
(FRU.TO) Gross Margin
IMG.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, IAMGOLD Corporation reported a gross profit of 141.20M and revenue of 477.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.6%.

FRU.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Freehold Royalties Ltd. reported a gross profit of 47.72M and revenue of 76.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.1%.

IMG.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, IAMGOLD Corporation reported an operating income of 112.20M and revenue of 477.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.5%.

FRU.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Freehold Royalties Ltd. reported an operating income of 44.34M and revenue of 76.86M, resulting in an operating margin of 57.7%.

IMG.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, IAMGOLD Corporation reported a net income of 39.70M and revenue of 477.10M, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.

FRU.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Freehold Royalties Ltd. reported a net income of 51.12M and revenue of 76.86M, resulting in a net margin of 66.5%.