IMD.AX vs. EIMI.L
IMD.AX (Imdex Limited) is a stock, while EIMI.L (iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF) is Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. Over the past 10 years, IMD.AX returned 35.31%/yr vs 10.29%/yr for EIMI.L. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IMD.AX vs. EIMI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IMD.AX is traded in AUD, while EIMI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EIMI.L values have been converted to AUD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMD.AX achieves a 18.21% return, which is significantly higher than EIMI.L's 12.70% return. Over the past 10 years, IMD.AX has outperformed EIMI.L with an annualized return of 35.31%, while EIMI.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.29% annualized return.
IMD.AX
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- -8.58%
- YTD
- 18.21%
- 6M
- 23.60%
- 1Y
- 42.62%
- 3Y*
- 30.26%
- 5Y*
- 16.43%
- 10Y*
- 35.31%
EIMI.L
- 1D
- -3.03%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 12.70%
- 6M
- 13.87%
- 1Y
- 30.87%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 8.72%
- 10Y*
- 10.29%
IMD.AX vs. EIMI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMD.AX Imdex Limited | 18.21% | 49.49% | 24.68% | -11.54% | -23.92% | 73.38% | 18.38% | 42.19% | 1.91% | 82.61% |
EIMI.L iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF | 12.70% | 22.57% | 18.16% | 11.12% | -14.37% | 5.17% | 8.37% | 16.91% | -4.98% | 26.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMD.AX and EIMI.L is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2014 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMD.AX vs. EIMI.L — Risk / Return Rank
IMD.AX
EIMI.L
IMD.AX vs. EIMI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Imdex Limited (IMD.AX) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IMD.AX | EIMI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.35 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 2.99 | -1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.63 | 9.88 | -4.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMD.AX | EIMI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 1.81 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.56 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.62 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.54 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
IMD.AX vs. EIMI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMD.AX drawdown since its inception was -94.48%, which is greater than EIMI.L's maximum drawdown of -25.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMD.AX and EIMI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMD.AX | EIMI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.48% | -25.56% | -68.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.08% | -10.29% | -12.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.63% | -11.85% | -17.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.50% | -23.51% | -29.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.50% | -23.84% | -29.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.58% | -4.98% | -3.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.86% | -6.98% | -34.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.70% | 3.12% | +4.58% |
Volatility
IMD.AX vs. EIMI.L - Volatility Comparison
Imdex Limited (IMD.AX) has a higher volatility of 16.25% compared to iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) at 7.54%. This indicates that IMD.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIMI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMD.AX | EIMI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.25% | 7.54% | +8.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.79% | 14.85% | +16.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.97% | 16.95% | +25.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.44% | 15.54% | +25.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.26% | 16.60% | +29.66% |
Dividends
IMD.AX vs. EIMI.L - Dividend Comparison
IMD.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, while EIMI.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIMI.L iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IMD.AX Imdex Limited | 0.67% | 0.74% | 1.21% | 1.91% | 1.54% | 0.95% | 0.99% | 2.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IMD.AX and EIMI.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for IMD.AX and EIMI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer