PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMD.AX vs. IWDA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMD.AX vs. IWDA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Imdex Limited (IMD.AX) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IMD.AX is traded in AUD, while IWDA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IWDA.L values have been converted to AUD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMD.AX achieves a 18.21% return, which is significantly higher than IWDA.L's 2.80% return. Over the past 10 years, IMD.AX has outperformed IWDA.L with an annualized return of 35.31%, while IWDA.L has yielded a comparatively lower 13.50% annualized return.


IMD.AX

1D
-1.22%
1M
-8.58%
YTD
18.21%
6M
23.60%
1Y
42.62%
3Y*
30.26%
5Y*
16.43%
10Y*
35.31%

IWDA.L

1D
0.05%
1M
4.01%
YTD
2.80%
6M
3.18%
1Y
14.63%
3Y*
18.14%
5Y*
13.72%
10Y*
13.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMD.AX vs. IWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMD.AX
Imdex Limited
18.21%49.49%24.68%-11.54%-23.92%73.38%18.38%42.19%1.91%82.61%
IWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
2.80%12.24%31.10%24.36%-12.70%29.35%5.86%27.72%0.74%13.40%

Correlation

The correlation between IMD.AX and IWDA.L is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2009

0.08

The correlation between IMD.AX and IWDA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (3 years) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMD.AX vs. IWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMD.AX
IMD.AX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
IMD.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMD.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMD.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
IMD.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMD.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

IWDA.L
IWDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
IWDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
IWDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMD.AX vs. IWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Imdex Limited (IMD.AX) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IMD.AXIWDA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.24

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

1.42

+0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.63

4.28

+1.35

IMD.AX vs. IWDA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMD.AX Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is comparable to the IWDA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMD.AX and IWDA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMD.AXIWDA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.03

1.30

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.95

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.92

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.81

-0.62

Drawdowns

IMD.AX vs. IWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMD.AX drawdown since its inception was -94.48%, which is greater than IWDA.L's maximum drawdown of -24.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMD.AX and IWDA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMD.AXIWDA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.48%

-24.44%

-70.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.08%

-10.29%

-12.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.63%

-15.26%

-14.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.50%

-20.72%

-32.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.50%

-24.44%

-29.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.58%

0.00%

-8.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.86%

-4.73%

-37.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.70%

3.41%

+4.29%

Volatility

IMD.AX vs. IWDA.L - Volatility Comparison

Imdex Limited (IMD.AX) has a higher volatility of 16.25% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L) at 2.75%. This indicates that IMD.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMD.AXIWDA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.25%

2.75%

+13.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.79%

8.41%

+23.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.97%

11.18%

+30.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.44%

14.48%

+26.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.26%

14.72%

+31.54%

Dividends

IMD.AX vs. IWDA.L - Dividend Comparison

IMD.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, while IWDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
IMD.AX
Imdex Limited
0.67%0.74%1.21%1.91%1.54%0.95%0.99%2.85%
IWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IMD.AX and IWDA.L have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMD.AX and IWDA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer