PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMCVX vs. VTMFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMCVX vs. VTMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Multi-Manager Mid Cap Value Fund (IMCVX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMCVX achieves a 10.31% return, which is significantly higher than VTMFX's 6.03% return. Over the past 10 years, IMCVX has outperformed VTMFX with an annualized return of 9.49%, while VTMFX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.70% annualized return.


IMCVX

1D
0.91%
1M
1.84%
YTD
10.31%
6M
9.93%
1Y
15.92%
3Y*
12.28%
5Y*
5.48%
10Y*
9.49%

VTMFX

1D
0.17%
1M
3.06%
YTD
6.03%
6M
6.16%
1Y
16.91%
3Y*
12.75%
5Y*
7.33%
10Y*
8.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMCVX vs. VTMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMCVX
Voya Multi-Manager Mid Cap Value Fund
10.31%4.09%10.72%9.44%-11.52%29.40%2.62%40.50%-15.20%15.06%
VTMFX
Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares
6.03%11.28%12.17%15.55%-12.69%13.10%13.31%18.01%-1.40%12.61%

Correlation

The correlation between IMCVX and VTMFX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2011

0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between IMCVX and VTMFX has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMCVX vs. VTMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMCVX
IMCVX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
IMCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
IMCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

VTMFX
VTMFX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
VTMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VTMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMCVX vs. VTMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Multi-Manager Mid Cap Value Fund (IMCVX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IMCVXVTMFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.55

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

3.22

-0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.30

15.40

-7.10

IMCVX vs. VTMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMCVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is lower than the VTMFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMCVX and VTMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMCVXVTMFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

2.83

-1.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.86

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.96

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.85

-0.20

Drawdowns

IMCVX vs. VTMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMCVX drawdown since its inception was -44.22%, which is greater than VTMFX's maximum drawdown of -28.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCVX and VTMFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMCVXVTMFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.22%

-28.49%

-15.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.47%

-5.38%

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.34%

-10.61%

-8.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.03%

-17.40%

-4.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.22%

-21.87%

-22.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.47%

-3.55%

-1.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

1.12%

+1.08%

Volatility

IMCVX vs. VTMFX - Volatility Comparison

Voya Multi-Manager Mid Cap Value Fund (IMCVX) has a higher volatility of 2.77% compared to Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX) at 1.70%. This indicates that IMCVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMCVXVTMFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.77%

1.70%

+1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.19%

4.75%

+3.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.06%

6.13%

+5.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.39%

8.52%

+8.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.12%

9.12%

+11.00%

IMCVX vs. VTMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMCVX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than VTMFX's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

IMCVX vs. VTMFX - Dividend Comparison

IMCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.35%, more than VTMFX's 2.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMCVX
Voya Multi-Manager Mid Cap Value Fund
8.35%9.21%11.72%0.98%8.69%15.71%4.38%19.23%20.04%7.09%3.00%21.05%
VTMFX
Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares
2.10%2.14%2.08%1.94%1.85%1.38%1.72%2.05%2.22%2.00%2.13%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


IMCVX and VTMFX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IMCVX has higher volatility (2.77%) compared to VTMFX (1.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMCVX dropped -44.22% vs VTMFX's -28.49%.

VTMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMCVX and VTMFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer