PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMCG vs. VSMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMCG vs. VSMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) and Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund Admiral Shares (VSMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMCG achieves a 18.63% return, which is significantly higher than VSMAX's 14.59% return. Over the past 10 years, IMCG has outperformed VSMAX with an annualized return of 14.48%, while VSMAX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.48% annualized return.


IMCG

1D
0.83%
1M
4.95%
YTD
18.63%
6M
17.29%
1Y
21.82%
3Y*
17.50%
5Y*
7.95%
10Y*
14.48%

VSMAX

1D
2.58%
1M
3.08%
YTD
14.59%
6M
12.93%
1Y
27.91%
3Y*
16.37%
5Y*
6.83%
10Y*
11.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMCG vs. VSMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMCG
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
18.63%6.55%18.14%20.73%-25.79%15.39%45.64%35.70%-3.68%25.57%
VSMAX
Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund Admiral Shares
14.59%8.83%14.23%18.17%-17.61%17.74%19.06%27.36%-9.33%16.24%

Correlation

The correlation between IMCG and VSMAX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2004

0.90

The correlation between IMCG and VSMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

IMCG vs. VSMAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IMCG
VSMAX

Technology

30.4%
17.2%

Industrials

26.6%
20.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
11.3%

Financial Services

9.1%
12.6%

Healthcare

7.4%
11.1%

Basic Materials

4.5%
4.8%

Real Estate

3.4%
7.6%

Utilities

2.7%
3.3%

Communication Services

2.6%
3.1%

Energy

2.1%
4.7%

Consumer Defensive

1.2%
3.4%

Technology

IMCG
30.4%
VSMAX
17.2%

Industrials

IMCG
26.6%
VSMAX
20.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IMCG
10.0%
VSMAX
11.3%

Financial Services

IMCG
9.1%
VSMAX
12.6%

Healthcare

IMCG
7.4%
VSMAX
11.1%

Basic Materials

IMCG
4.5%
VSMAX
4.8%

Real Estate

IMCG
3.4%
VSMAX
7.6%

Utilities

IMCG
2.7%
VSMAX
3.3%

Communication Services

IMCG
2.6%
VSMAX
3.1%

Energy

IMCG
2.1%
VSMAX
4.7%

Consumer Defensive

IMCG
1.2%
VSMAX
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMCG vs. VSMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMCG
IMCG Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
IMCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMCG Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
IMCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMCG Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

VSMAX
VSMAX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
VSMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
VSMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMCG vs. VSMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) and Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund Admiral Shares (VSMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IMCGVSMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.29

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

3.11

-0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.22

11.42

-3.20

IMCG vs. VSMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMCG Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the VSMAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMCG and VSMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IMCG vs. VSMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMCG drawdown since its inception was -58.96%, roughly equal to the maximum VSMAX drawdown of -59.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCG and VSMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMCGVSMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.96%

-59.68%

+0.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.17%

-8.97%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.92%

-25.25%

+3.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.08%

-28.14%

-6.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.08%

-41.82%

+6.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.66%

-0.32%

-1.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.21%

-9.68%

+0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

2.44%

+0.22%

Volatility

IMCG vs. VSMAX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) has a higher volatility of 7.07% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund Admiral Shares (VSMAX) at 5.47%. This indicates that IMCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VSMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMCGVSMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.07%

5.47%

+1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.73%

12.32%

+1.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.49%

16.69%

-0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.31%

20.77%

-0.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.58%

21.59%

-1.01%

IMCG vs. VSMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMCG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VSMAX's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IMCG vs. VSMAX - Dividend Comparison

IMCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than VSMAX's 1.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMCG
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.66%0.78%0.78%0.85%0.91%0.41%0.09%0.30%0.35%0.45%0.52%0.38%
VSMAX
Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund Admiral Shares
1.19%1.33%1.30%1.56%1.54%1.24%1.14%1.39%1.67%1.35%1.49%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, IMCG and VSMAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IMCG has higher volatility (7.07%) compared to VSMAX (5.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMCG dropped -58.96% vs VSMAX's -59.68%.

VSMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMCG and VSMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer